Search for: "State v. House"
Results 7101 - 7120
of 28,800
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
13 Aug 2019, 9:58 pm
As Chief Justice Roberts stated in Knick: In Williamson County [Regional Planning Comm’n v. [read post]
13 Aug 2019, 12:03 pm
Those questions were addressed by the Supreme Judicial Court in Wallace W., a Juvenile v. [read post]
13 Aug 2019, 11:08 am
Supreme Court decided Kelo v. [read post]
13 Aug 2019, 9:57 am
§ 552(a)(6)(E)(v)(I). [read post]
13 Aug 2019, 9:44 am
Resolution 114 and the Report to the ABA House of Delegates may be accessed HERE. [read post]
13 Aug 2019, 5:15 am
United States v. [read post]
13 Aug 2019, 3:17 am
” In Cotten v. [read post]
12 Aug 2019, 9:57 am
Housing Act of 1937; and (5) Medicaid, except for: (i) Benefits received for an emergency medical condition as described in 42 U.S.C. 1396b(v)(2)-(3), 42 CFR 440.255(c); (ii) Services or benefits funded by Medicaid but provided under the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA) 20 U.S.C. 1400 et seq.; (iii) School-based services or benefits provided to individuals who are at or below the oldest age eligible for secondary education as determined under State or… [read post]
12 Aug 2019, 8:10 am
In 2017, the Indian Supreme Court, in the case State Bank of India v Santosh Gupta, observed that even though Article 370 was labeled a “[t]emporary provision[]” and the Constituent Assembly had dissolved, the article “continue[s] to be in force” (¶12)—thus indicating it had attained permanent status. [read post]
12 Aug 2019, 5:06 am
From a New Hampshire Supreme Court decision earlier this year in MacDonald v. [read post]
11 Aug 2019, 9:01 pm
Term Limits, Inc. v. [read post]
11 Aug 2019, 9:51 am
On the Housing Act point and the issue of fact finding, Bubb v Wandsworth LBC (2011) EWCA Civ 1285 remained binding authority that the county court cannot decide disputed facts in a s.204 appeal. [read post]
11 Aug 2019, 6:41 am
Let's explore the 7th Circuit Court of Appeals decision in SportFuel, Inc. v. [read post]
11 Aug 2019, 4:30 am
The opponents’ stated goal is to eliminate “ the divisive concept “ consent from the resolution; this point of principle cannot be avoided and will be presented to the House. [read post]
9 Aug 2019, 1:36 pm
That's because courts have shunned the only means available for obtaining relief: Bivens v. [read post]
9 Aug 2019, 9:05 am
v=DO4J_PC1b5M and learn more at https://www.nytimes.com/2017/11/20/travel/detroit-michigan-downtown.html. [read post]
9 Aug 2019, 5:35 am
In the United States, to implement such a system via constitutional amendment, the process laid out by Article V requires that two-thirds of both houses of Congress propose the amendment, or that the amendment arises from a convention called for by two-thirds of state legislatures. [read post]
9 Aug 2019, 3:00 am
House Democrats File Lawsuit to Enforce Subpoena Against McGahn The Hill – Olivia Beavers, Jacqueline Thomsen, and Morgan Chalfant | Published: 8/7/2019 House Judiciary Committee Chairperson Jerrold Nadler filed a civil lawsuit to enforce a subpoena for testimony from Don McGahn, the former White House counsel who at the Trump administration’s direction defied lawmakers’ request to appear before the committee. [read post]
8 Aug 2019, 11:51 pm
Court date set for the Trecarrell House Limited v Rouncefield case This is the gas safety certificate case discussed here. [read post]
8 Aug 2019, 10:17 am
Vishnu Kannan shared the House Judiciary Committee’s civil complaint filed in the U.S. [read post]
