Search for: "State v. Key" Results 7101 - 7120 of 20,422
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
30 Apr 2014, 8:37 am by Florian Mueller
None whatsoever.History could now repeat itself in connection with the Apple v. [read post]
2 Jun 2018, 1:01 am by rhapsodyinbooks
” But the voting rights of American Indians and Alaska Natives have been further eroded or ignored since the United States Supreme Court overturned a key provision of the Voting Rights Act in 2013 in Shelby County v. [read post]
24 May 2011, 5:31 am
Supreme Court's recent prison overcrowding case of Brown v. [read post]
20 May 2011, 3:24 am by David Smith
Most crucially, for this case is the exception in paragraph 7 which states that a tenancy which was previously an Assured tenancy cannot be regranted as an AST unless a notice in a prescribed form had been served. [read post]
20 May 2011, 3:24 am by David Smith
Most crucially, for this case is the exception in paragraph 7 which states that a tenancy which was previously an Assured tenancy cannot be regranted as an AST unless a notice in a prescribed form had been served. [read post]
5 Jun 2014, 12:14 pm
IMS Health Inc., 131 S.Ct. 2653, 2659 (2011), and United States v. [read post]
7 Dec 2023, 1:30 am by Sherica Celine
He also defends companies in state consumer protection investigations and data breach responses. [read post]
15 Jun 2011, 12:50 am by Matthew Flinn
Second, and giving all appropriate weight to what was said in R (C (A Minor)) v Secretary of State for Justice [2008] EWCA Civ 882, [2009] QB 657, and E v Chief Constable of the Royal Ulster Constabulary and another (Northern Ireland Human Rights Commission and others intervening) [2008] UKHL 66, [2009] 1 AC 536, the circumstan [read post]
7 Apr 2019, 8:47 pm by Omar Ha-Redeye
Although the focus of this Convention was on arbitrations between an investor and a State and the implementation of the UNCITRAL Rules on Transparency in Treaty-based Investor-State Arbitration, it signalled at the highest level our willingness to make concessions that would improve consistency between jurisdictions on key financial disputes. [read post]
27 Feb 2020, 4:00 am by Sean Vanderfluit
As it stated at para. 7 of Vavilov, it had become clear that the simplicity and predictability promised by Dunsmuir v. [read post]