Search for: "The United States, Petitioner"
Results 7101 - 7120
of 8,963
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
18 May 2021, 5:56 am
The mother alleged that she was not able to return to the United States until 2019, after she signed a divorce agreement in the presence of the father and several other men, all of whom were carrying weapons, including firearms and traditional swords. [read post]
29 Sep 2011, 6:09 am
Next week, the Supreme Court of the United States will hear oral arguments in a case that could eliminate the ability of providers and Medicaid beneficiaries to challenge state Medicaid rates in federal courts. [read post]
23 Jun 2022, 12:27 pm
See, e.g., United States v. [read post]
18 Jul 2007, 8:22 pm
Then there is a maverick bunch of petitioners who are trouping to the courts with frivolous prayers. [read post]
30 Nov 2022, 6:16 am
Solicitor General’s Arguments Against Certiorari At the invitation of the Supreme Court, the Solicitor General submitted a brief on behalf of the United States, requesting that the Court deny ERIC’s request for review. [read post]
27 Apr 2016, 9:30 pm
Similar failures—technically known as open-phase conditions—have occurred in recent years in the United States, Canada, Sweden, and the United Kingdom. [read post]
30 Aug 2023, 2:12 pm
If the employer fails to take either step, the NLRB will order mandatory union recognition (with no NLRB election) unless the employer – in a later unfair labor practice (ULP) proceeding – proves that the union did not have majority support or that the claimed bargaining unit was inappropriate. [read post]
21 Mar 2012, 4:53 pm
" The term "navigable waters" is defined in the Clean Water Act as, "the waters of the United States," §1362(7). [read post]
25 Jun 2010, 7:54 am
” The Court held that the presence of some domestic activity in this case does not mean petitioners only seek domestic application of the Act; the Exchange Act’s focus is not on the place the deception originated, but on the purchases and sales of securities in the United States. [read post]
29 Oct 2012, 11:04 am
In more plain English, if someone in the United States purchases legitimate copies of some item abroad that has a copyrighted work somewhere in it, can they import those items into the United States and resell them here without violating the Copyright Act? [read post]
3 Jan 2015, 3:34 pm
United States, 561 U.S. 358, 370, 383 (2010) (crediting that “the facts of the case were ‘neither heinous nor sensational’” and there was “[n]o evidence of the smoking-gun” of his guilt); United States v. [read post]
14 Jan 2007, 12:11 pm
The one-year limitation period did not begin until the date petitioner confirmed the child's residence in the United States. [read post]
25 Jan 2024, 6:00 am
Office of the United States Trustee v. [read post]
21 Apr 2017, 4:59 am
United States, 16-402, and (apparently) Jordan v. [read post]
27 Nov 2018, 8:05 am
” Arguments of United States as amicus curiae Arguing for the United States as amicus curiae in support of the troopers, Principal Deputy Solicitor General Jeffrey Wall argued that most constitutional tort claims contain an objective requirement that prevents a purely subjective inquiry into officers’ motivations. [read post]
1 Oct 2007, 4:45 am
Bagley, No. 04-4289Dismissal of a petition for a writ of habeas corpus in a death penalty case is affirmed over a meritless claim that the state trial court violated the United States Constitution by admitting certain "other acts" evidence at trial, over his objection. [read post]
16 Mar 2022, 2:35 pm
Walmart offered petitioner Edward Hedican a job as a salaried assistant manager at a store that is open 24 hours a day, seven days a week. [read post]
10 Jul 2006, 2:18 pm
Accordingly, it concluded that Ndgiri was a temporary transfer, that he retained a strong community of interest with the other unit employees, and that he was an eligible voter. [read post]
3 Oct 2019, 12:00 am
Petitioner State of Kansas subsequently charged Glover with driving as a habitual violator. [read post]
25 Feb 2021, 7:56 am
Court held that appellant/real party in interest was not entitled to writ relief of any kind, and specifically held that the family court was not acting outside its jurisdiction by not automatically giving full faith and credit to a divorce decree from a foreign country under the Full Faith and Credit Clause of the United States Constitution. [read post]
