Search for: "The United States, Petitioner" Results 7101 - 7120 of 8,963
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
1 Sep 2010, 3:15 am by Scott A. McKeown
Prior to June 25, 2010 the Patent Owner’s argument would have been rejected by the BPAI as a petitionable issue. [read post]
31 Aug 2010, 5:05 pm by Keith Rizzardi
 The Center for Biological Diversity sent FWS a Petition to List 404 Aquatic, Riparian and Wetland Species from the Southeastern United States (see ESA blawg) and sent NOAA Fisheries a separate petition to list 83 species of coral (again, see ESA blawg). [read post]
30 Aug 2010, 11:50 am by John J. Burke
Restani of the United States Court of International Trade (“CIT”) on August 4, 2010 ordered the United States Department of Commerce (“DOC”) to forego the imposition of countervailing duties on pneumatic off-the-road tires from the People’s Republic of China. [read post]
30 Aug 2010, 11:50 am by John J. Burke
Restani of the United States Court of International Trade (“CIT”) on August 4, 2010 ordered the United States Department of Commerce (“DOC”) to forego the imposition of countervailing duties on pneumatic off-the-road tires from the People’s Republic of China. [read post]
30 Aug 2010, 6:34 am
The fate of climate change litigation now rests in the hands of the United States Supreme Court. [read post]
30 Aug 2010, 3:00 am by Anna Christensen
United States (09-6822) Respondent’s brief in Costco v. [read post]
29 Aug 2010, 6:32 pm by Mike Aylward
The fate of climate change litigation now rests in the hands of the United States Supreme Court. [read post]
27 Aug 2010, 12:18 pm by Anna Christensen
United States and Gould v. [read post]
26 Aug 2010, 12:37 pm by Immigration Lawyer Peter Messersmith
The new law requires additional filing fees of $2,000 for H1B visa petitioner and $2,250 for L1A and L1B petitions where the US petitioning company employs 50 or more employees in the United States and more than 50 percent of its employees in the United States are in H-1B or L visa status. [read post]
26 Aug 2010, 10:39 am by Jacob Sapochnick
The sample certification that the petitioner is not obligated to pay the fee would be: “[Name of employer] has over [insert total US employees] employees in the United States, of whom fewer than [insert number or percent] are H-1B or L nonimmigrants. [read post]
25 Aug 2010, 7:30 am by Anna Christensen
Amicus brief of the American Association on Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities and The Arc of the United States Title: Maples v. [read post]
24 Aug 2010, 8:12 am by Anna Christensen
Petition for certiorari Title: United States v. [read post]
23 Aug 2010, 5:48 am
Aug. 6, 2010), the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit held that the Securities & Exchange Commission (“SEC” or “Commission”) failed adequately to explain the basis of, and failed to provide adequate support for, its approval of a proposed fee by NYSE Arca for access by investors to its proprietary “depth-of-book” product, Arcabook. [read post]
23 Aug 2010, 3:00 am by Anna Christensen
United States (09-5801) Respondent’s brief in United States v. [read post]
23 Aug 2010, 12:19 am
The decision states that “notwithstanding equitable considerations and the [Town’s] consent to reinstatement, the court can only direct reinstatement in the event it finds the petitioner was improperly removed as a matter of law. [read post]