Search for: "United States of America v " Results 7101 - 7120 of 8,954
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
13 Jan 2011, 5:54 pm by Juliana
In the appointment letter, Kosinki designates Burns to “perform the duties of United States District Judge temporarily for the District of Arizona for the specific case United States of America v. [read post]
12 Jan 2011, 8:57 pm by Alex Gasser
(“Tessera”) filed a complaint alleging violations of Section 337 in the importation into the United States, the sale for importation, and the sale within the United States after importation of certain semiconductor chips with minimized chip package size and products containing same by reason of infringement of U.S. [read post]
12 Jan 2011, 9:08 am
Justice Elena Kagan ruled against the “applicable” expense provision in her first decision for the United States Supreme Court. [read post]
10 Jan 2011, 12:14 am by Kevin LaCroix
Among other cases that have survived are those involving Citigroup (refer here), AIG (here), Countrywide (here), Fannie Mae (here), Washington Mutual (here), New Century Financial (here), Sallie Mae (here) and Bank of America (here). [read post]
9 Jan 2011, 11:56 am by Rick
The United States of America was not founded to control. [read post]
7 Jan 2011, 8:06 pm by Franco Tarulli
In July of last year, I wrote about the case of Gucci America, Inc. v. [read post]
7 Jan 2011, 1:15 pm by Adam Schlossman
Brief for respondent Pharmaceutical Research and Manufacturers of America Title: McNeill, Clifton T. v. [read post]
6 Jan 2011, 1:18 pm by Steve
We argued a similar limitations issue years ago in United Mine Workers of America 1974 Pension Trust v. [read post]
5 Jan 2011, 1:22 pm by WIMS
In this case, which was argued over two years ago (December 10, 2008), the United States of America appeals from two orders of the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York which denied its applications for a restitution award in favor of the Republic of South Africa, pursuant to, first, the Mandatory Victims Restitution Act of 1996 (MVRA), and second, the Victim and Witness Protection Act of 1982 (VWPA). [read post]
5 Jan 2011, 12:38 am by John Day
Mazda Motors of America, and when the United States Supreme Court decides the case we will have a better understanding of the law of preemption. [read post]
4 Jan 2011, 10:59 am by Danielle Citron
 Despite still believing Assange’s actions have been harmful, I have now come to the opposite conclusion—not for the benefit of Assange, but for the benefit of Americans and of the United States. [read post]
4 Jan 2011, 8:36 am by Charley
Schwarzenegger in the federal United States District Court for the Northern District of California. [read post]