Search for: "United States v. Heard" Results 7101 - 7120 of 8,393
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
19 May 2010, 2:11 pm by Mark Bennett
" At the time Magistrate Judge Nancy Johnson was the judge responsible for that docket; also at the time Judge Johnson's husband Tim was the acting United States Attorney. [read post]
15 May 2010, 9:57 am by Gene Quinn
The United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit yesterday announced that they would take up the matter of Tivo, Inc. v. [read post]
15 May 2010, 9:34 am by INFORRM
  Ms Kaschke has a torrent of posts on the case, the most recent of which is entitled “Victims of Terror Unite” which calls on victims of terror to unite “against this very liberal ruling of Mr Justice Eady“. [read post]
14 May 2010, 4:30 am
 The Federal Circuit has already heard oral argument on the Pequignot v. [read post]
13 May 2010, 10:22 am
Rather, as Rebecca posted, what's heard is one "Maybe this'll work? [read post]
12 May 2010, 2:38 pm by Lyle Denniston
”  Federal law makes it a crime, Katyal said, and President Obama has “stated unequivocally that the United States does not engage in torture. [read post]
12 May 2010, 1:40 am by INFORRM
President Obama has nominated his solicitor general, former Harvard Professor Elena Kagan, as a Justice of the Supreme Court of the United States. [read post]
May 14, 2010)(O'Neill) (civil forfeiture case, truck driver failed to show entitlement to money hidden in truck and unclaimed byowner)THE STATE OF TEXAS v. $281,420.00 IN UNITED STATES CURRENCY; from Hidalgo County; 13th district (13-06-00158-CV, ___ SW3d ___, 04-03-08)The Court reverses the court of appeals' judgment and remands the case to the trial court.Justice O'Neill delivered the opinion of the Court [pdf]View E-Briefs in No. 08-0465 THE… [read post]
10 May 2010, 10:53 am by Timothy J. Maier
  While the "first sale" rule certainly applies to goods purchased within the United States and subsequently resold within the United States, at issue here is whether or not the rule applies to goods bought abroad and then resold in the United States, as Costco did in this case. [read post]
10 May 2010, 2:23 am by gmlevine
The Panel found contrary to Complainant’s conclusory assertions [that it had been well-known throughout the United States and particularly to those in its industry] [] that the issue of bad faith presents a close question. [read post]
8 May 2010, 8:53 am by INFORRM
The Legal Satyricon blog has a post about United States District Court for the District of New Jersey in Murphy v. [read post]