Search for: "United States v. Mark"
Results 7101 - 7120
of 10,394
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
10 Feb 2012, 2:16 am
Directive 89/104 ... to approximate the laws of the Member States relating to trade marks [which may as well not have been repealed and re-enacted for all the notice the courts take of its replacement, Directive 2008/95 of October 2008] be interpreted as meaning that the exclusive right conferred by the registered mark can definitely no longer be asserted by its proprietor against a third party, in respect of all goods covered by it at the time of registration: where, for… [read post]
9 Feb 2012, 8:13 am
Succeeding on a dilution claim against a small competitor without a meaningful market presence is made more difficult with this decision, notwithstanding the change in law designed to avoid this type of outcome, which was enacted subsequent to the United States Supreme Court's decision in the seminal Victoria's Secret case. [read post]
8 Feb 2012, 12:40 pm
United States, asserting that the message reflected discussions about litigation strategy between a company engineer and in-house counsel. [read post]
8 Feb 2012, 7:45 am
Since the landmark case of Jones v. [read post]
8 Feb 2012, 4:00 am
Protected Domain Services – Customer ID: NCR-813584 / Daniel Wang, D2011-0435 (WIPO May 10, 2011) pointed out that there are “numerous other United States trademark registrations for TDS for a wide variety of goods and services. [read post]
7 Feb 2012, 7:37 pm
This decision surely marks the height of his hubris. [read post]
7 Feb 2012, 2:11 pm
Meanwhile, at Guantánamo and elsewhere, the United States holds enemy combatants “for the duration of hostilities. [read post]
7 Feb 2012, 7:32 am
Under the trademark laws of the United States, the first person to use a trademark has superior rights in the mark. [read post]
7 Feb 2012, 6:54 am
Honeywell v. [read post]
6 Feb 2012, 11:03 am
” State v. [read post]
6 Feb 2012, 5:12 am
In United States v. [read post]
6 Feb 2012, 2:37 am
Page 36: The Manual on International Marks has been changed in order to reflect Rule 17 (2) (v) Common Regulations that require that when an opposition is filed against and international registration, the International Bureau shall be notified, among other, of the list of all the goods and services of the earlier mark on which the opposition is based. [read post]
5 Feb 2012, 9:53 am
Meanwhile, at Guantanamo and elsewhere, the United States holds enemy combatants “for the duration of hostilities. [read post]
5 Feb 2012, 7:55 am
Florida filing latest in Motorola v Apple war Nothing warms patent lawyers' cockles during these freezing winter months than more mobile patent disputes. [read post]
4 Feb 2012, 6:13 am
United States, Linda C. [read post]
3 Feb 2012, 2:44 pm
The AP’s Mark Sherman (via the Traverse City (Mich.) [read post]
3 Feb 2012, 7:40 am
This year, however, the Court has released 21, including blockbusters United States v. [read post]
2 Feb 2012, 9:02 am
[FN1] The Sixth Circuit's opinion in United States v. [read post]
2 Feb 2012, 6:37 am
Although the Justices are in their mid-term recess, coverage of the Court continues to focus on last week’s decision in United States v. [read post]
1 Feb 2012, 8:50 pm
Additionally, both pre- and post- issuance opposition has long existed for United States trademarks. [read post]
