Search for: "V D" Results 7101 - 7120 of 76,273
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
8 May 2022, 6:30 am
In the first test of a state’s board-diversity requirement, a Los Angeles County Superior Court judge has entered summary judgment in favor of the plaintiff in Crest v. [read post]
8 May 2022, 6:30 am
In the first test of a state’s board-diversity requirement, a Los Angeles County Superior Court judge has entered summary judgment in favor of the plaintiff in Crest v. [read post]
8 May 2022, 4:00 am by SOQUIJ
Le fait que la direction de la Ville n’ait pas consulté la demanderesse alors qu’elle a procédé à certaines vérifications auprès de Postes Canada n’est pas un facteur déterminant dans le processus d’adoption du règlement 2326. [read post]
7 May 2022, 10:49 am by Hayleigh Bosher
In the US, eBay v MercExchange made it more difficult to obtain injunctions for patent infringement. [read post]
7 May 2022, 7:33 am by José Guillermo
Usted señora Juez, NO QUIERE RESOLVER MI DESESTIMIENTO ,  SESENTISEIS DÍAS DESPUES   qu7e mi expediente ingresó a su despacho para que conociera  la apelación por mi interpuesta contra el extremo de la distribución de la Pensión ordenada pagar, por mi parte NO DEJARÉ DE QUEJARME, TODOS LOS DÍAS, la protección de la Presidente del Poder Judicial, señora ELVIA BARRIOS ALVARADO  se evidencia… [read post]
6 May 2022, 2:22 pm
But the concept is basically the same thing: plaintiff didn't put forward enough evidence, so defendant's entitled to prevail.Defendant's argument is thus, essentially, that even if there was error in depriving the plaintiff of his right to a jury trial (and, to be clear, it was), no blood, no foul, since he'd have lost anyway based upon his failure of proof. [read post]
6 May 2022, 11:24 am by LII Team
 While one might get the impression that “PRO” exists primarily to engage the kind of litigation that led to, for example, its 2020 Supreme Court win in Georgia v. [read post]
6 May 2022, 11:13 am by LII Team
Public.Resource.Org., Inc., 13-cv-1215 (D. [read post]
6 May 2022, 8:00 am by Gene Takagi
Notable Events of the Week: “The Supreme Court has voted to strike down the landmark Roe v. [read post]
6 May 2022, 6:10 am by Noah J. Phillips
” Recognizing that the Sherman Act could be read to bar all contracts, federal courts for over a century have interpreted the 1890 antitrust law only to apply to “unreasonable” restraints of trade.[7] The Supreme Court first adopted this concept in its landmark 1911 decision in Standard Oil, upholding the lower court’s dissolution of John D. [read post]