Search for: "York v York"
Results 7101 - 7120
of 51,488
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
3 Nov 2008, 1:25 pm
In Pludeman v. [read post]
5 Jan 2015, 10:00 am
" Ana Oliveira (New York... [read post]
27 Aug 2020, 10:20 am
New York)MANGO V. [read post]
25 Aug 2011, 5:00 am
In Centro Empresarial Cempresa S.A. v America Movil, S.A.B. de C.V., 2011 NY Slip Op 4720, 1 (N.Y. [read post]
28 Sep 2016, 1:28 pm
See Philadelphia v. [read post]
28 Nov 2006, 7:11 am
Today's New York Times urges the Supreme Court to force the Environmental Protection Agency to regulate greenhouse gases under the Clean Air Act. [read post]
29 Oct 2010, 11:42 am
The story was first reported in the New York Law Journal yesterday (sub required) and in today’s New York Times. [read post]
21 Dec 2009, 9:18 am
Real Estate Group of New York, Inc., 2009 WL 4842470 (N.Y. [read post]
30 Jan 2012, 5:00 am
— Alabama v. [read post]
26 Dec 2007, 12:31 am
In C v D [2007] EWCA Civ 1282, D insured C under a Bermuda Form policy that provided for London arbitration and was governed by New York Law. [read post]
16 Jan 2007, 4:04 am
That question was recently put to the test in the case of McKesson Information Solutions, Inc. v. [read post]
7 Feb 2007, 12:26 am
Schwartz, a law professor at Touro College, writes that the decision in Paul v. [read post]
4 Aug 2020, 12:00 am
The court explained that "The scope of judicial review under the Human Rights Law is extremely narrow and is confined to the consideration of whether the determination of the SDHR is supported by substantial evidence** in the record," citing Matter of New York State Div. of Human Rights v Roadtec, Inc., 167 AD3d 898. [read post]
4 Aug 2020, 4:00 am
The court explained that "The scope of judicial review under the Human Rights Law is extremely narrow and is confined to the consideration of whether the determination of the SDHR is supported by substantial evidence** in the record," citing Matter of New York State Div. of Human Rights v Roadtec, Inc., 167 AD3d 898. [read post]
3 Nov 2009, 2:25 pm
Utica Insurance Co. v. [read post]
6 Apr 2010, 5:28 am
It's called Jones v. [read post]
25 Jul 2007, 1:55 pm
Scullin's decision in Alexander & Catalano v. [read post]
11 Dec 2013, 2:21 pm
An interesting and unusual choice of law problem, on which New York’s highest court split 4-2-1 yesterday in In the Matter of Holmes v. [read post]
11 Jun 2009, 1:38 pm
COMMERCIAL LAW, CONSUMER PROTECTION LAW, GOVERNMENT LAW, HEALTH LAW New York v. [read post]
29 Apr 2019, 3:46 am
Briefly: Adam Liptak visits The New York Times’ podcast The Daily to talk about Department of Commerce v. [read post]
