Search for: "Andrews v. Andrews"
Results 7121 - 7140
of 7,462
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
12 Jan 2024, 12:30 pm
Next week, the Supreme Court will hear oral argument in an IJ case, DeVillier v. [read post]
1 Jul 2021, 2:50 am
… Thus, as Andrew Clapham observes, the European Convention on Human Rights replaced the idea of protecting the individual against State measures with the idea of protecting the individual through State measures. [read post]
11 Feb 2018, 9:01 pm
For her first affirmative defense and objection, Irene asserted that the prenuptial agreement was defective, invalid, and unenforceable pursuant to the 2013 New York Court of Appeals decision in Galetta v Galetta, 21 N.Y.3d 186, because the acknowledgments omitted language expressly stating that the notaries knew the signers or had ascertained, through some sort of proof, that the signers were the persons described as required by Domestic Relations Law § 236(B)(3). [read post]
10 Jan 2008, 12:41 am
By Andrew Cohen | January 7, 2008; 1:03 PM ETPrevious: Your Lethal Injection Case Crib Notes | Next: Bush v. [read post]
14 Aug 2019, 6:09 am
• Douglas V. [read post]
13 Nov 2020, 4:00 am
Andrew King It’s Saturday. [read post]
7 Aug 2014, 12:40 pm
It was held in Jean C. v Andrew B that implicit in the statute is the assumption that it is generally in the best interests of a child to know who her biological father is and not be burdened with one who is not in fact her natural father. [read post]
22 Sep 2011, 4:25 am
: 09-076/09-090/09-091 Superior Fine Papers Inc. v. [read post]
5 Dec 2017, 12:01 pm
Andrew P. [read post]
30 Apr 2012, 11:19 am
(Sierra Club, Inc. v. [read post]
22 Dec 2023, 11:00 am
See Walsh v. [read post]
1 Apr 2025, 11:19 pm
The paper given by Professor Andrew Dickinson (University of Oxford) raised the question of “Is there any magic in characterisation? [read post]
5 Oct 2006, 12:23 am
Serbia and Montenegro) Case Resources Pulp Mills on the River Uruguay (Argentina v. [read post]
15 Oct 2017, 7:09 pm
Our very concept of analogous rights under. s. 15 would not even exist without the robust discussions around the delineations of equality rights found in cases like Andrews, Egan, Vriend, M v H, Miron, Corbiere, and Lavoie. [read post]
5 Apr 2010, 7:09 pm
The Baker v. [read post]
24 May 2009, 10:45 am
" Chaplinsky v. [read post]
6 Jan 2016, 5:08 pm
It is United States v. [read post]
19 Jul 2023, 9:05 pm
The Securities and Exchange Commission regulations on climate disclosure, first proposed in March 2022 and likely to be issued in final form in October 2023,[1] have drawn considerable controversy and face an uncertain fate in the inevitable litigation.[2] Much less attention has gone to two bills that are moving toward adoption in California. [read post]
29 Jan 2011, 4:19 pm
See Till v. [read post]
23 Mar 2017, 3:02 pm
May not be case by case but we have to figure out where and why to draw lines, some of which will be normative but not all.McKenna: surveys directed at words—Gucci v. [read post]
