Search for: "Beare v. State"
Results 7121 - 7140
of 15,040
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
9 Apr 2015, 5:00 am
Cheech and ChongIn a recent detailed Order issued in the case of Detrick v. [read post]
9 Apr 2015, 5:00 am
” State v. [read post]
9 Apr 2015, 4:23 am
One of the more significant recent developments in the corporate and securities litigation arena has been the emergence of the debate over fee-shifting bylaws following the Delaware Supreme Court’s May 2014 decision in ATP Tour, Inc. v. [read post]
9 Apr 2015, 1:07 am
Hillsman v. [read post]
8 Apr 2015, 7:22 am
Moreover, the lower court did not err in its review of the decision under the Missouri Administrative Procedure Act (Draper v. [read post]
8 Apr 2015, 5:00 am
This so-called “[c]ommon-defense exception,” Walton v. [read post]
7 Apr 2015, 9:01 pm
In Orr v. [read post]
6 Apr 2015, 9:04 pm
Co. v. [read post]
6 Apr 2015, 6:46 pm
On September 30, 2009, the plaintiff filed DD v SK and MR, in Supreme Court, Kings County, bearing Index Number 24694/2009. [read post]
6 Apr 2015, 4:11 pm
Accordingly, this Court holds that AC § 10-131(b) does not implicate the Second Amendment right to keep and bear arms. [read post]
6 Apr 2015, 3:55 pm
Accordingly, this Court holds that AC § 10-131(b) does not implicate the Second Amendment right to keep and bear arms. [read post]
6 Apr 2015, 8:22 am
” Cf., Dabush v. [read post]
6 Apr 2015, 6:21 am
Blinn v. [read post]
5 Apr 2015, 4:05 pm
As for the phrase "bear arms," the Court adopted Justice Ginsburg's definition in Muscarello v United States, 524 US 125, 143 (1998), which it said "accurately captured the natural meaning of bear arms, '" that is," wear, bear or carry... upon the person or in the clothing or in a pocket, for the purpose... of being armed and ready for offensive or defensive action in a case of conflict with another person.'" … [read post]
5 Apr 2015, 3:49 pm
As for the phrase "bear arms," the Court adopted Justice Ginsburg's definition in Muscarello v. [read post]
4 Apr 2015, 4:00 pm
" United States v Yancey, 621 F3d 681, 684-85 (7th Cir. 2010). [read post]
4 Apr 2015, 3:42 pm
" United States v. [read post]
4 Apr 2015, 2:54 pm
The District Attorney did state that in her summation. [read post]
3 Apr 2015, 3:49 pm
(Heller v District of Columbia ["Heller II"], 698 F Supp 2d 179 [D DC 2010]; Ezell v City of Chicago, — F Supp 2d —, 2010 WL 3998104 [ND Ill 2010]).4 Page 4 Penal Law §§ 265.01 and 400.005 Penal Law § 265.01(1) states, in relevant part, that a "person is guilty of criminal possession of a weapon in the fourth degree when: (1) [h]e possesses any firearm. [read post]
3 Apr 2015, 9:35 am
The case du jour is Dapeer v. [read post]
