Search for: "Cross v. State"
Results 7121 - 7140
of 16,708
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
17 Dec 2015, 8:00 am
Pekin Insurance Co. v. [read post]
17 Dec 2015, 5:02 am
Puerto Rico Coffee Roasters LLC v. [read post]
16 Dec 2015, 10:03 am
By Glen Hansen Beverly Hills Unified School District v. [read post]
16 Dec 2015, 4:00 am
Commentary on Monday’s opinion in DIRECTV v. [read post]
16 Dec 2015, 4:00 am
The statement was made out of court so the “declarant” (person who made the statement) is unable to be cross-examined.The tricky part: hearsay may be admitted if the statement is not offered prove the truth of what was actually stated. [read post]
16 Dec 2015, 3:13 am
Additional Resources: 16 accidents, 30 days of suspension, no problem, Nov. 20, 2015, By Brittany Wallman, Sun-Sentinel More Blog Entries: Joerg v. [read post]
15 Dec 2015, 10:11 am
Lander v. [read post]
15 Dec 2015, 9:38 am
In the similar Song Fi v. [read post]
15 Dec 2015, 7:46 am
” the project director repeated that the employer did not hire “cross-genders. [read post]
15 Dec 2015, 6:01 am
His interpretation of the Annex contradicts the most basic cannon of treaty interpretation under the Vienna Convention on the law of treaties, which states in Article 31 that “A treaty shall be interpreted in good faith in accordance with the ordinary meaning to be given to the terms of the treaty in their context and in the light of its object and purpose. [read post]
15 Dec 2015, 4:00 am
The statement was made out of court so the “declarant” (person who made the statement) is unable to be cross-examined.The tricky part: hearsay may be admitted if the statement is not offered prove the truth of what was actually stated. [read post]
15 Dec 2015, 3:04 am
’ The African Union and its Member States Parties' Participation as High Contracting States Parties to the Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court (1998) [read post]
14 Dec 2015, 8:29 am
Facts: This case (UNITED STATES EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY COMMISSION v. [read post]
14 Dec 2015, 6:30 am
Choice-of-law clauses pose even more difficult questions when the state with the greater interest in the lawsuit has a strong public policy concerning non-competes.A stark illustration of these choice-of-law rules comes from the recent Fifth Circuit case of Cardoni v. [read post]
14 Dec 2015, 4:00 am
The statement was made out of court so the “declarant” (person who made the statement) is unable to be cross-examined.The tricky part: hearsay may be admitted if the statement is not offered prove the truth of what was actually stated. [read post]
13 Dec 2015, 10:43 pm
The same thought apply mutatis mutandis to paragraphs 49 to 51 and 77 of the judgment of 6 November 2014 in Vans v OHIM (Representation of a wavy line), T‑53/13, also invoked by K-Swiss. [read post]
13 Dec 2015, 10:20 am
Maryland v. [read post]
13 Dec 2015, 4:00 am
For example, assertions can reflect a state of mind versus an assertion of truth. [read post]
12 Dec 2015, 8:26 am
” Ramirez v. [read post]
12 Dec 2015, 7:09 am
Ben alerted us to the European Court of Human Rights’ opinion in Roman Zakharov v. [read post]
