Search for: "Day v. Texas" Results 7121 - 7140 of 7,591
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
6 Apr 2014, 9:30 am by Lyle Denniston
Under a 1971 Supreme Court decision, Bivens v. [read post]
27 Jun 2010, 9:36 pm
It is correctly pronounced HOW STUN not U STONE like they do it in Texas. [read post]
22 Oct 2015, 4:35 pm by Kevin LaCroix
The Fifth Circuit’s October 21, 2015 opinion in Martin Resource Management Corporation v. [read post]
25 Dec 2016, 10:01 pm by News Desk
An agreement between Blue Bell and the Texas State Department of Health Services requires the company to pay $175,000 within 30 days of the signing of the agreement. [read post]
12 Jul 2017, 5:57 am by Eugene Volokh
The Washington Supreme Court, in a case examining the similarly-worded telephone-harassment statute, has defined “intimidate” to include “compel[ling] to action or inaction (as by threats),” Seattle v. [read post]
8 Apr 2024, 10:08 am by admin
The limits of peer review ultimately make it a poor proxy for the validity tests posed by Rules 702 and 703. [read post]
27 Feb 2012, 7:24 am by Sasha Volokh
To the extent accountability concerns are about individuals “having their day in court,” the statutes can guarantee that as well. [read post]
18 Apr 2021, 3:01 pm by Kevin LaCroix
The complaint purports to be filed on behalf of a class of investors who purchased Romeo shares (or shares of Romeo’s predecessor-in-interest RMG) between October 5, 2020 (the day the planned merger was announced) and March 30, 2021 (the day of the company reported its 2020 financial results). [read post]
13 Mar 2017, 1:20 pm by Barbara S. Mishkin
  The order also indicates that the oral argument in Lucia v. [read post]