Search for: "Does, A-H"
Results 7121 - 7140
of 16,615
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
7 Jun 2024, 3:30 am
The opinion of the Court (the “Opinion”) holds that the SEC lacked the rulemaking authority to issue these Rules under both Section 211(h) and Section 206(4) of the Investment Advisers Act of 1940 (the “Advisers Act”). [read post]
7 Nov 2015, 6:35 am
But, the decision here not only does not describe whatever this is, or how it was applied in this case. [read post]
13 Mar 2019, 6:22 am
Because the law does not require first appearances for in-custody misdemeanor defendants, these defendants may sit in jail for weeks or more until their first court date. [read post]
16 Aug 2016, 10:00 pm
Rule 23(h) would need amendment to determine how attorneys’ fees would be calculated. [read post]
18 Mar 2013, 4:33 pm
Godfread on March 15t h . [read post]
2 Jan 2020, 5:02 am
" Aaron H. [read post]
2 Dec 2009, 6:00 pm
Fortunately, the USCIS does not make laws. [read post]
1 May 2009, 11:36 am
Furthermore, while Section 44 was “generally intended” to implement elements of the Paris Convention, In re Rath, 402 F.3d at 1207, 74 USPQ2d at 1177, it does not, through subsections 44(b) or (h) or otherwise, provide the user of an assertedly famous foreign trademark with an independent basis for cancellation in a Board proceeding, absent use of the mark in the United States. [read post]
23 Aug 2011, 8:55 am
(Bank Holding Company Act of 1956 Sec. 13(h)(1) as amended by Sec. 619 of the Dodd-Frank Act). [read post]
22 Feb 2011, 5:04 pm
(P-H),” “A. [read post]
3 Nov 2015, 5:54 am
Prosecution for this offense does not preclude civil sanctions or remedies. [read post]
23 Jul 2012, 2:59 am
” RPC 1.0(h). [read post]
22 Apr 2011, 5:01 am
”The opinion does not indicate whether the return was prepared manually or through the use of software. [read post]
1 Dec 2010, 5:00 am
Decker 3,000 William H. [read post]
15 Mar 2021, 4:00 am
Does law need it’s own metric? [read post]
25 Sep 2018, 10:11 am
Such an appointment does not require reinstatement from retirement. [read post]
21 Apr 2012, 9:01 am
The appellant argues that this language does not satisfy the burden established in Martin v. [read post]
7 Jun 2018, 8:34 pm
Or does some “provision to the contrary” control, allowing probation to be revoked for any violation in deferral cases? [read post]
13 Mar 2011, 1:09 pm
On appeal, the Court began by noting that the mere fact that an alimony award was incorporated into a property settlement agreement does not render it indefinitely unmodifiable. [read post]
12 Aug 2011, 10:10 am
AB889 deletes the 3352(h) exemption. [read post]
