Search for: "EXPENSE OF JUDGES" Results 7121 - 7140 of 24,984
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
15 Jul 2013, 9:00 am by Adam Kielich
As long as the agreement does not require the judge to do something the judge cannot or should not do, the court will follow the agreement. [read post]
29 Jul 2014, 6:33 am by John Hochfelder
On May 14, 2012, following the the damages trial, the judge awarded damages in the sum of $1,017,500 as follows: $225,000 past pain and suffering – 10 years, $475,000 future pain and suffering – 30 years $17,500 past medical expenses  $300,000 future medical expenses Now, on appeal, the damages decision has been affirmed in Reynolds v. [read post]
22 May 2019, 6:44 pm by Pulgini & Norton, LLP
Reviewing this report, additional medical evidence, and testimony from the worker, the judge concluded that the right shoulder injury was not a natural consequence of the original left shoulder injury and that the insurer was not required to provide coverage for the expenses associated with its treatment. [read post]
16 Oct 2014, 8:45 am by G.A. Napier
Some judges use a “Colorado” formula that involves a multiplier (usually 1.5) of the regular statutory support amount to reflect the fact that each home has to provide extra expenses when the child stays there half the time. [read post]
4 Jan 2011, 1:33 pm by James J. Gross
  It’s time consuming, nerve-wracking, and incredibly expensive. [read post]
12 Mar 2012, 6:39 am by G.A. Napier
Some judges use a “Colorado” formula that involves a multiplier (usually 1.5) of the regular statutory support amount to reflect the fact that each home has to provide extra expenses when the child stays there half the time. [read post]
17 Oct 2022, 5:35 am by Samantha S. Erks, JD
A judge may decide to deviate from the standard number based on the extra medical expenses that your child has. [read post]
19 Feb 2010, 4:56 pm by Raymond McKenzie
Contrast these expenses with trials and other court hearings, where judges have no financial interest in prolonging a case, and filing fees are minimal. 2. [read post]
29 Apr 2007, 7:53 pm
  HB 170 - INSURANCE COVERAGE FOR AUTISM -Prohibit health insurers from excluding coverage for autism HB 171 - ISSUANCE OF PROFESSIONAL LICENSES - To revise the laws governing issuance of certain professional licenses HB 172 - SEALING OFFICIAL COURT RECORDS - Require the sealing of the official records of a person who is found not guilty of an offense HB 173 - JUDGES - To increase compensation for justices and judges and to change qualifications for all… [read post]
7 Jun 2012, 1:38 pm
District Court Judge Douglas Woodlock recently accelerated the trial schedule because Mr. [read post]
19 Sep 2012, 12:43 pm by Gideon Alper
What will the judge think of your relationship? [read post]
24 Feb 2011, 3:00 am by Andrew Flusche
So that would have saved him the expense and time of traveling all the way here. [read post]
5 Jul 2012, 5:40 am
But the one hold-out forced the federal judge to declare a mistrial. [read post]
19 Oct 2011, 3:00 am by Ted Folkman
Under Rule 26(c)(1), the question is whether the banks are facing undue expense, not whether they will incur any expense. [read post]