Search for: "Fair v. State"
Results 7121 - 7140
of 27,414
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
21 Jun 2018, 10:10 am
Carpenter v. [read post]
17 Apr 2015, 4:23 pm
Kelly v. [read post]
19 Nov 2015, 9:02 pm
He called Oracle v. [read post]
7 May 2024, 1:11 pm
Furthermore, the law lacks a fair process or sufficient evidence to justify its restrictive measures. [read post]
7 May 2024, 1:11 pm
Furthermore, the law lacks a fair process or sufficient evidence to justify its restrictive measures. [read post]
11 Jan 2016, 8:31 am
In Friedrichs v. [read post]
10 Oct 2008, 10:05 am
State Secretariat for Economic Affairs of the Swiss Confederation (SECO) ["Nada-case"] by the Swiss Federal Supreme Court and - in an added note - the case regarding Yassin Abdullah Kadi et al. v. [read post]
17 Oct 2019, 12:01 pm
The first case, Mathena v. [read post]
17 Nov 2008, 11:27 am
State v. [read post]
30 Mar 2009, 3:52 am
DeVry Inc. v. [read post]
18 Oct 2009, 11:07 am
The district court dismissed the complaint as fair use as a matter of law. [read post]
16 Nov 2022, 1:42 am
In El Diwany v Solicitors Regulation Authority Ltd [2022] EWHC 2882 (Admin), he appealed against an order of the Solicitors Disciplinary Tribunal (“the SDT”) dated 18 November 2021 refusing his application to be restored to the Roll [1]. [read post]
2 Jun 2010, 11:21 am
Amigon, 233 F.Supp.2d 462 (E.D.N.Y.2002), the court stated that Hoffman Plastic Compounds, Inc. v. [read post]
20 May 2013, 8:50 am
Twenty years ago today, Congress passed the National Voter Registration Act (NVRA), in order to make voter registration free, fair, and accessible for all Americans. [read post]
23 Apr 2014, 7:35 am
There are many individuals and groups in Michigan who lost as a result of yesterday's United States Supreme Court decision in Schuette v. [read post]
18 Dec 2014, 9:44 am
The plaintiffs sue for false arrest.The case is Garcia v. [read post]
Amended Class Definition That Excludes Putative Class Member Does Not Preclude American Pipe Tolling
24 Jun 2014, 2:40 pm
Co. v. [read post]
5 Dec 2015, 7:28 am
Union of India & Anr v. [read post]
24 Aug 2023, 6:00 am
The Appellate Division opined that contrary to the Employee's contention, the record before the hearing officer contained substantial evidence to sustain the findings of misconduct and, citing Matter of Haug v State Univ. of N.Y. at Potsdam, 32 NY3d at 1046, and, contrary to the Employee's assertion, noted that "hearsay statements ... were admissible" in a Civil Service Law §75 administrative disciplinary action. [read post]
24 Aug 2023, 6:00 am
The Appellate Division opined that contrary to the Employee's contention, the record before the hearing officer contained substantial evidence to sustain the findings of misconduct and, citing Matter of Haug v State Univ. of N.Y. at Potsdam, 32 NY3d at 1046, and, contrary to the Employee's assertion, noted that "hearsay statements ... were admissible" in a Civil Service Law §75 administrative disciplinary action. [read post]
