Search for: "Good v. Good"
Results 7121 - 7140
of 76,267
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
4 May 2022, 3:26 am
Texas and Obergefell v. [read post]
3 May 2022, 9:03 pm
” “Notice of Interlocutory Appeal” “Notice of Premises of Penhallow v. [read post]
3 May 2022, 9:01 pm
This has numerous dimensions, including (i) corporate purpose[9], (ii) corporate reputation, (iii) corporate communication, (iv) community involvement and relations, and (v) CEO and employee activism[10]. [read post]
3 May 2022, 9:00 pm
In light of this week’s leak of Samuel Alito’s draft opinion by which the Supreme Court will soon overrule Roe v. [read post]
3 May 2022, 7:52 pm
A good example is Value-Added Tax: if you have multiple items with, say, 19% VAT, you arrive at many numbers with more post-point digits than the maximum of two that you can put on an invoice (example: if the net invoice amount is 325.99, 19% VAT amounts to 61.9381, but an invoice would round this to "61.94" and then arrive at a bottom-line amount of 387.93). [read post]
3 May 2022, 3:18 pm
Might There Be Some Good News Today? [read post]
3 May 2022, 2:33 pm
Roe v. [read post]
3 May 2022, 2:01 pm
They invoke AMG Capital Management v. [read post]
3 May 2022, 1:39 pm
In March 2020, the Delaware Supreme Court held in Salzburg v. [read post]
3 May 2022, 1:34 pm
I outlined this scenario here: In Gonzales v. [read post]
3 May 2022, 1:26 pm
Such exploration covers: (i) the origin, nature, and purpose of concepts and categories used in legal analysis; (ii) the experiential nature of the meaning of such concepts and categories used in legal analysis; (iii) the freedoms and restraints applicable to such concepts and categories as a result of either experience or of the concepts or categories themselves; (iv) how workable notions of virtue rightly balance such freedoms and restraints in legal analysis; (v) the distinction between… [read post]
3 May 2022, 1:26 pm
Such exploration covers: (i) the origin, nature, and purpose of concepts and categories used in legal analysis; (ii) the experiential nature of the meaning of such concepts and categories used in legal analysis; (iii) the freedoms and restraints applicable to such concepts and categories as a result of either experience or of the concepts or categories themselves; (iv) how workable notions of virtue rightly balance such freedoms and restraints in legal analysis; (v) the distinction between… [read post]
3 May 2022, 11:34 am
Xiulu Ruan v. [read post]
3 May 2022, 7:33 am
Wade and Planned Parenthood v. [read post]
3 May 2022, 6:30 am
All of us are more than aware—and some of us remain truly angry—that Ruth Bader Ginsburg, even years after she was diagnosed with what are typically quite virulent forms of cancer, chose to roll the dice with the country’s future for no good reason other than her own vanity. [read post]
3 May 2022, 5:38 am
” Kokinis v. [read post]
3 May 2022, 5:01 am
Good to know! [read post]
3 May 2022, 2:58 am
McDonald’s has filed applications for McDONALD’s, MCCAFE, and its M Logo covering, among other things, “[v]irtual food and beverage products” in Class 9 and “[o]perating a virtual restaurant featuring actual food and beverages” in Class 43 (see here, here and here). 2. [read post]
3 May 2022, 2:00 am
Hartmann v. [read post]
3 May 2022, 2:00 am
Hartmann v. [read post]
