Search for: "Label v Label"
Results 7121 - 7140
of 13,306
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
4 Feb 2013, 6:13 am
Merck Eprova AG v. [read post]
4 Feb 2013, 6:11 am
Merck Eprova AG v. [read post]
1 Feb 2013, 9:42 am
See Demahy v. [read post]
1 Feb 2013, 3:36 am
Remember Case C-462/09 Thiuskopie v Opus?]. [read post]
31 Jan 2013, 9:30 pm
In Noel Canning v. [read post]
31 Jan 2013, 7:24 am
Clark v. [read post]
30 Jan 2013, 8:46 pm
Nathan v. [read post]
30 Jan 2013, 12:38 pm
Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has not approved antipsychotic medications for ADHD in children, making it an “off-label” use. [read post]
29 Jan 2013, 10:44 am
Gopika Murthy, to present a refreshing outlook on the copyright infringement and issues over terms of service relating to social media, as were highlighted in Agence France Presse v. [read post]
29 Jan 2013, 10:37 am
That’s precisely the scenario that prompted the case of Pfizer Inc. v. [read post]
28 Jan 2013, 4:35 am
Hall v. [read post]
28 Jan 2013, 4:18 am
Nathan v. [read post]
27 Jan 2013, 11:53 pm
Image from herePreviously, we had blogged about the arbitration between India and Pakistan under the Indus Water Treaty, 1960 (the previous sixteen posts can be accessed from this label). [read post]
26 Jan 2013, 1:17 pm
Doctor’s Associates, Inc., No. 1:13-cv-00498, January 22, 2013).Subway advertises and sells submarine sandwiches labeled as “Footlong” subs. [read post]
25 Jan 2013, 6:05 pm
To be sure, the minority commissioners can write vociferous dissents and try to signal to the DC Circuit that there are problems, like in Business Roundtable v. [read post]
25 Jan 2013, 12:47 pm
We’ve received the same bone-headed response from an appellate court in a branded case, seeWimbush v. [read post]
25 Jan 2013, 5:00 am
That a cause of action is labeled a UCL claim is not dispositive; instead, “the nature of the right sued upon” (Jefferson v. [read post]
24 Jan 2013, 11:49 am
Jan. 11, 2013), and LaBarre v. [read post]
24 Jan 2013, 10:20 am
Blehm v. [read post]
24 Jan 2013, 10:09 am
Jan. 14, 2013); then a day later – Desai v. [read post]