Search for: "Liable Defendant(s)"
Results 7121 - 7140
of 21,107
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
31 Mar 2021, 4:00 am
Spencer, 2021 ONSC 2029 (CanLII) [132] If a harmful animal is not in the possession or control of its owner and at the material time is under control of someone else, the defendant owner cannot be held liable under the scienter doctrine although there might be alternative liability, for example, by negligence if the defendant had not taken reasonable care to prevent injury from being caused by the animal even though it was under another party’s control or… [read post]
23 Dec 2011, 4:43 pm
The claim is that the "defendant’s duties were foreseeable in that the event and the rapper’s audience required that due care and security be maintained to avoid injury and loss of life that occurred. [read post]
27 Oct 2011, 9:25 am
” A defendant may have become liable to serve a sentence consecutive to the one being served that he has not yet begun to serve. [read post]
20 Apr 2012, 11:44 am
Defendants argued that the witness' testimony was mere speculation and there was no substantiated proof that Crane should be held liable. [read post]
13 Jun 2011, 8:49 am
All three of the defendants have denied any wrongdoing. [read post]
2 Nov 2017, 11:16 am
In cases involving roadside construction accidents, negligent drivers and their employers too may be deemed liable. [read post]
24 Apr 2014, 4:28 pm
To be fair, the defendants aren’t saints either. [read post]
16 Oct 2019, 5:29 pm
If the victim’s damages were proximately caused by the defendant’s breach of duty, the defendant can be held liable for payment of monetary compensation to the plaintiff for his or her damages. [read post]
1 Nov 2009, 8:16 pm
The ruling does not hold that defendants in future cases involving attacks by pit bulls will be held “strictly liable” – a type of liability usually involving “inherently dangerous activities” or “unavoidably unsafe products” for which few defenses exist (that’s a separate subject) – but it does hold that a defendant’s knowledge of that breed can be a factor considered by a jury in determining… [read post]
1 Nov 2009, 8:16 pm
The ruling does not hold that defendants in future cases involving attacks by pit bulls will be held “strictly liable” – a type of liability usually involving “inherently dangerous activities” or “unavoidably unsafe products” for which few defenses exist (that’s a separate subject) – but it does hold that a defendant’s knowledge of that breed can be a factor considered by a jury in determining… [read post]
Loss of Consortium Need Not Be Complete Nor Must Spouse's Injury Hurt Relationship To be Compensable
9 Jun 2011, 7:00 am
At trial, Adelaide recovered $555,128 based upon the finding of defendant liable for the accident and her injuries. [read post]
30 May 2019, 11:15 am
The district court denied the plaintiff’s motion for an extension of time and granted the defendant’s motion to dismiss due to the plaintiff’s failure to properly serve the defendant with process within 90 days as required by Massachusetts law. [read post]
10 Dec 2009, 1:08 pm
The seller of an apartment or real estate is liable to the buyer for defects - including the information provided by the agent prior to sale and any defects in that information.The agent is not liable for e.g. incorrect information on the house manager's certificate, unless the agent had reason to believe that the information in question was incorrect. [read post]
27 Jul 2009, 12:45 am
Twelve of the defendants charged were associated with the Krupp company, which had been Germany's leading armament manufacturer. [read post]
6 Feb 2022, 1:30 pm
The defendants raised various special defenses. [read post]
20 Mar 2015, 10:18 am
GoDaddy * Trademark Owner Can’t Hold GoDaddy Liable for Domain Name Forwarding — Berhad v. [read post]
10 Apr 2009, 3:52 am
Furthermore, the Court noted that granting plaintiff's motion could result in the bizarre outcome of defendant being liable for violating plaintiff's trademark today, but tomorrow, after issuance of defendant's mark, defendant may be able to assert the trademark against plaintiff. * For more on this case, click here to read the Blog's archives about the case or here for a Las Vegas Trademark Attorney post… [read post]
7 Dec 2011, 8:46 pm
—Houston [1st Dist.] 2003, pet. denied) (“[T]he ‘One Satisfaction Rule’ . . . was designed to prevent a windfall to plaintiffs, and dictates that when a plaintiff files a suit against multiple defendants for a single injury, any settlements will be credited against the amount for which non-settling defendants are found liable. [read post]
2 Apr 2024, 10:51 pm
” Claim based on information provided by third parties, of which defendants were not the speaker Seeking to avoid Section 230 immunity, the government sought to hold defendants liable for their own conduct. [read post]
11 Aug 2021, 6:53 am
The judges rejected the defendant’s argument that under Pinterest’s TOS, all users would only upload content legally, as they saw no set of experiences that users comply with such TOS. [read post]
