Search for: "Love v. State"
Results 7121 - 7140
of 9,059
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
2 Mar 2011, 9:02 am
In Snyder v. [read post]
2 Mar 2011, 6:14 am
View the Head Order in “Virginia State Bar EX REL, Second District Committee v. [read post]
1 Mar 2011, 9:47 pm
Recall his famous ruling in the movie-industry case of United States v. [read post]
1 Mar 2011, 6:43 am
Updated | Association belge des Consommateurs Test-Achats ASBL, Yann van Vugt, Charles Basselier v Conseil des ministres, Case C? [read post]
1 Mar 2011, 6:30 am
For those that are not lawyers, Loving v. [read post]
28 Feb 2011, 4:16 pm
In a Californian case, Moreno v. [read post]
28 Feb 2011, 1:10 am
Much loved by innovative SMEs: the Loan Arranger In a thoughtful and much-commented piece hosted by the IPKat on Friday ("Pioneers, Pirates and Parvenus – IP v Innovation", here), Gwilym Roberts -- who attended one of the Hargreaves Review meetings last week -- made some valuable observations about the "problem" of the IP system being not so much the system itself but the failure of funding to back innovative projects. [read post]
27 Feb 2011, 9:49 pm
TTAB affirms refusal of LUVD G & Design over THE LOVED DOG for clothing (TTABlog) US Trade Marks – Lawsuits and stra [read post]
26 Feb 2011, 6:34 am
Love, 39 N.J.L. 476. [read post]
26 Feb 2011, 6:07 am
It was upon an examination of the above that the Appellate Division in Levine v. [read post]
26 Feb 2011, 5:32 am
In Braud v. [read post]
25 Feb 2011, 6:42 pm
The action is back around nation-states in a heightened Westphalian competitiveness mode, and I trust that folks at the Pentagon are not so focused on n0n-state actor threats that they have forgotten about the spectre of state-to-state wars, whether the Koreas, China and Taiwan, Pakistan and India, Russia and Georgia among other places, just to name off the nuclear players in this. [read post]
25 Feb 2011, 1:25 pm
Love it. [read post]
25 Feb 2011, 8:00 am
In Christopher v. [read post]
25 Feb 2011, 3:17 am
(IP Osgoode) General – Copyright Copyright 2.0 show – Episode 186 includes Universal v Lenz update, Marvel comic win against Stan Lee (PlagiarismToday) Australia Australia confirms ISPs are not copyright cops: Roadshow Films v iiNet (Ars Technica) (ipwars) (Excess Copyright) (IP Whiteboard) (1709 Copyright Blog) (TorrentFreak) Lander J upholds Registrar’s decision to allow DIGITEK: Hills Industries Limited v Bitek Pty Ltd (ipwars) (ipwars) Canada… [read post]
23 Feb 2011, 12:48 pm
The human story behind Bond v. [read post]
23 Feb 2011, 6:07 am
It's basically the same point we made over two years ago with our own state-by-state list, here. [read post]
23 Feb 2011, 5:23 am
http://tinyurl.com/47udhb6 (Philip Gordon) Davis v. [read post]
22 Feb 2011, 12:43 pm
State: I love this line from this case: "What seems at first to be a legal problem frequently turns out to be a linguistic or a semantic problem. [read post]
