Search for: "M v. M"
Results 7121 - 7140
of 53,966
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
13 Apr 2017, 1:04 pm
But I don't see any of them coming into play here.I'm sure my analysis is overly simplistic. [read post]
18 May 2018, 2:22 pm
I'm not exactly sure.But I wonder if a reasonable person couldn't conclude that the line is more like 1 or 2 seconds. [read post]
9 Apr 2018, 1:05 pm
" I'm confident that's correct. [read post]
22 Nov 2016, 12:10 pm
You can't just "average" the competing results.What the trial court did just seems crazy.So I'm totally with the Court of Appeal on that.But there's one part of the opinion I'm less sure about.The Court of Appeals notes that "The Marcus and Forsyth appraisals discounted the fair value of appellants' shareholder interest by 20 percent and 15 percent for lack of control. [read post]
1 Mar 2017, 1:55 pm
If you wanted to do it.I'm admittedly torn as to what I would do. [read post]
16 Feb 2024, 3:35 pm
(Except for taxpayers, of course.)I'm confident the ringleaders got longer sentences, but still. [read post]
5 Dec 2019, 1:23 pm
On the legal question, I'm not at all certain the Legislature wanted people convicted of inflicting great bodily injury -- a serious offense -- when the victim engaged in voluntary conduct that led to the death. [read post]
12 Nov 2020, 3:01 pm
I'm fine with that. [read post]
4 Oct 2023, 3:02 pm
Abousleman (Water Rights; Winters Doctrine) Jeremiah M., Hannah M. and Hunter M., et al. v. [read post]
2 Oct 2016, 12:44 pm
(b) in the case of trusts: (i) the settlor; (ii) the trustee(s); (iii) the protector, if any; (iv) the beneficiaries, or where the individuals benefiting from the legal arrangement or entity have yet to be determined, the class of persons in whose main interest the legal arrangement or entity is set up or operates; (v) any other natural person exercising ultimate control over the trust by means of direct or indirect ownership or by other means. [read post]
3 May 2010, 2:06 pm
Law Lessons from CECILIA M. [read post]
15 Jul 2020, 9:41 am
La gobernadora Wanda Vázquez Garced firmó la nueva Ley 65 de 2020 para enmendar el Código Penal de Puerto Rico y tipificar como delito de manera más específica el llamado grooming contra menores de edad. [read post]
27 Aug 2010, 7:56 am
I’m at a conference today, so I can’t provide longer case summaries. [read post]
2 Oct 2019, 9:30 am
Still, I’m always fascinated when a high-volume copyright litigator has the profit-o-meter running in reverse. [read post]
9 Mar 2021, 5:02 am
[I’m continuing to serialize a new law review article draft of mine.] [read post]
19 Feb 2012, 10:23 pm
Unlike in the ACLU v. [read post]
25 Feb 2009, 9:00 pm
This makes me want to get up and do my cheapskate happy dance (lucky for you this isn't a v-blog!!) [read post]
28 Mar 2012, 5:00 am
Kwikset Corp. v. [read post]
8 Sep 2010, 3:30 am
The case was pretty juicy involving a $3.5 million gambling debt, but I'll let you look the rest of the details up if you're interested- Zarin v. [read post]
13 Feb 2012, 6:46 am
The case you are thinking of is M v Hammersmith & Fulham LBC [2008] UKHL 14, [2008] 1 WLR 535. [read post]
