Search for: "Majors v. Majors"
Results 7121 - 7140
of 55,566
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
20 May 2022, 12:43 am
Paczolay and Felici JJ disagreed with the majority’s reasoning in finding no violation of Article 14 read in conjunction with Article 8. [read post]
5 Oct 2011, 5:51 pm
In today’s argument in Golan v. [read post]
21 Feb 2024, 1:34 pm
Agreeing with the majority opinion in Force v. [read post]
20 Dec 2023, 12:22 pm
The Honorable Lawrence Parish (Criminal Jurisdiction; McGirt v. [read post]
22 Mar 2012, 5:00 pm
Jackson v. [read post]
3 Nov 2022, 10:45 am
The prevailing 6-3 majority stated that the prior 7-2 decision was “egregiously wrong” “exceptionally weak” and produced “damaging consequences. [read post]
8 Jan 2019, 7:36 am
Unlike Frank v. [read post]
2 Feb 2010, 6:20 pm
See United States v. [read post]
7 Mar 2011, 8:34 am
The Court’s new 6-3 decision in Skinner v. [read post]
12 Mar 2009, 8:12 am
Parry (Lewis & Clark - Law) has posted A Primer on Treaties and Section 1983 after Medellin v. [read post]
24 Jul 2019, 12:18 pm
In Gamble v. [read post]
24 Jul 2008, 5:52 am
Here is the abstract:This essay analyzes and critiques District of Columbia v. [read post]
22 Feb 2024, 2:51 pm
Last year, a few major U.S. [read post]
19 Mar 2007, 3:47 pm
Frederick (06-278), a clear majority of the Justices showed significant skepticism about creating a wide exception to the curb on suppression of student speech that the Court spelled out in 1969 in Tinker v. [read post]
14 Aug 2009, 11:53 am
Following mini-oral argument on the application for leave to appeal, the Michigan Supreme Court held in People v. [read post]
28 Apr 2020, 11:28 am
Pena v. [read post]
28 Apr 2011, 7:42 pm
By Mike Dorf On Wednesday, the Supreme Court handed down a 5-4 ruling in AT&T Mobility LLC v. [read post]
1 Jul 2009, 5:09 am
State and Craven v. [read post]
27 Oct 2023, 11:44 am
State v. [read post]
29 Jun 2015, 7:50 am
Less favorable, though, was Heien v. [read post]
