Search for: "Matter of Mark T."
Results 7121 - 7140
of 16,585
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
23 Feb 2016, 11:45 am
And why should it matter that the copyright holder complains about something that didn't affect them anyway? [read post]
23 Feb 2016, 11:30 am
“Don’t use a five-dollar word when a fifty-cent word will do,” Mark Twain told us. [read post]
23 Feb 2016, 10:04 am
Mark these on your calendar in a way that makes them stick out among your other dates. [read post]
23 Feb 2016, 12:01 am
Washington’s philosophy of accommodation to the status quo in racial matters. [read post]
22 Feb 2016, 7:17 pm
Unless and until the FCC has released a decision in a matter, it’s premature to try to bring the court in. [read post]
22 Feb 2016, 2:15 pm
I don’t know how they can do that. [read post]
22 Feb 2016, 7:49 am
"For the record, Grits thinks that assessment dramatically overstates matters. [read post]
21 Feb 2016, 2:42 pm
Summary judgment is appropriate if there is no genuine dispute of material fact and the nonmoving party is entitled to judgment as a matter of law. [read post]
21 Feb 2016, 2:05 pm
[Blogmeister’s Note: FHH represents L-3 in this matter.] [read post]
21 Feb 2016, 6:26 am
(A similar issue is addressed in Last chance agreement doesn't bar arbitration when union is not a party)City to appeal order confirming award reinstating police officerArbitrator Mark Reed sustained a grievance filed on behalf of a Guthrie, Oklahoma police officer dismissed for his actions in arresting his wife's ex-husband. [read post]
20 Feb 2016, 10:56 am
Heirs that agreed to do something = doesn’t matter given the statutory language. [read post]
20 Feb 2016, 7:41 am
But still, intellectually I think it's clear that he didn't do better because he didn't care to, and in his setting didn't need to. [read post]
19 Feb 2016, 4:08 pm
Mark McKenna: Who counts as a user? [read post]
19 Feb 2016, 2:50 pm
The appearance of the drug doesn’t matter. [read post]
19 Feb 2016, 11:57 am
Theory: owners “shepherd” their marks/works better. [read post]
19 Feb 2016, 10:18 am
If the applicant decides to use the mark anyway, without a registration, should the PTO’s determination bind a federal court asked to determine whether the new mark, as actually used, causes confusion with that previously registered mark? [read post]
19 Feb 2016, 10:05 am
It shouldn’t matter but perhaps the script details make a difference to that analysis. [read post]
19 Feb 2016, 9:39 am
Mark Cuban is indeed fighting the good fight in that regard.I just don't understand why Apple takes a position on design patents that pretty much every other company in the industry disagrees with. [read post]
18 Feb 2016, 2:18 pm
No matter what these “protocols” could be, it is difficult to imagine that they could ever mitigate the damage done by the false association of a defendant with a crime scene. [read post]
18 Feb 2016, 11:55 am
Credit for this opinion goes to Judge Mark E. [read post]
