Search for: "P. v. Long"
Results 7121 - 7140
of 7,176
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
5 Feb 2007, 12:23 am
Criminal Sanction Impact.01/29/07 referred to codesLAW / CORRECTNSA3787
Gottfried (MS) -- Provides for review by the department of health of policies and practices regarding HIV, AIDS and HCV at correctional facilitiesSUMM : Amd S206, Pub Health L Authorizes and directs the department of health to review any policy or practice instituted in facilities operated by the department of correctional services and in local correctional facilities regarding human immunodeficiency virus (HIV), acquired… [read post]
3 Feb 2007, 10:50 am
[10] Unocal Corp. v. [read post]
2 Feb 2007, 5:48 pm
Muñoz, USMC 2d Lt Nathan P. [read post]
1 Feb 2007, 7:01 pm
They even know less about the Supreme Court’s decision in Roe v. [read post]
1 Feb 2007, 6:26 am
Bring on Sherlock Holmes . . .and at least one lawyer, trained in evidence . . . pro bono publico.THE GERUM CLOAK MYSTERYThe more than 2000-year old Cloak of Gerum (photos and info below) provides us - as we will show - with the greatest "real" (non-fiction) cloak and dagger mystery of all time, unsolved up to now, but - as we allege - for the most part solved (but not entirely) in this posting.The technology that we use to solve this mystery is demonstrated in the following graphic -… [read post]
31 Jan 2007, 1:28 am
P. 16(b)(1)(C). [read post]
28 Jan 2007, 8:04 pm
" Nollan v. [read post]
28 Jan 2007, 4:40 pm
Not long after posting about spam, I picked up (via the Tech News Review feed) this story from Friday’s Times, a report of a case (Microsoft v McDonald, 12 December 2006, Levinson J in the High Court, Chancery) from the tail end of 2006…where Microsoft took on the spammers and…well, IPKat has a good summary, so over to them: Microsoft normally protected Hotmail subscribers against spam by setting up its own ‘target accounts’, which it used as decoys to… [read post]
25 Jan 2007, 12:06 am
With that in mind, Ford & Harrison managing partner Michael P. [read post]
18 Jan 2007, 1:05 pm
Burlington Northern Railroad Co. v. [read post]
17 Jan 2007, 8:15 am
(See, e.g., Chertkova v. [read post]
16 Jan 2007, 7:59 pm
A number of you have inquired about the latest in my long string of mobile systems. [read post]
15 Jan 2007, 5:25 am
*** (On that, we take the Fifth.)For a copy of the Court's decision in People v. [read post]
11 Jan 2007, 1:40 am
In Quon v. [read post]
10 Jan 2007, 11:07 am
(Transcript, p. 20). [read post]
10 Jan 2007, 7:46 am
See Richerson, 535 P.2d at 648 (requiring that the officer be "confronted with an emergency"); Hammer v. [read post]
7 Jan 2007, 4:53 pm
Cir. 2006).]The law review did not appear to discuss Exxon v. [read post]
3 Jan 2007, 10:30 am
See generally Michael P. [read post]
31 Dec 2006, 2:42 am
In Maui Tomorrow v. [read post]
30 Dec 2006, 10:46 pm
Auth. v. [read post]
