Search for: "People v. More" Results 7121 - 7140 of 43,579
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
26 Apr 2010, 9:28 am
  As a result of the vague standards set out in the statute the courts have developed a test to determine whether a nonprofit hospital is entitled to tax exemption.[7]            The test was first articulated in Methodist Old Peoples Home v. [read post]
20 Feb 2011, 3:43 am by PaulKostro
Even more troubling, “to the extent that the polygraph errs, studies have repeatedly shown that the polygraph is more likely to find innocent people guilty than vice versa. [read post]
16 Jul 2024, 6:06 am by Jeff Welty
Bump stocks became widely known in 2017 when Stephen Paddock used them while killing dozens of people and wounding hundreds more at the Harvest Music Festival in Las Vegas. [read post]
15 Feb 2010, 5:20 am by Howard Wasserman
" What is perhaps more troubling is that our students come to law school with this attitude and perception. [read post]
10 Feb 2012, 7:22 am
The Court of Appeals agreed, and it reversed the Court of Special Appeals.The Court noted that "handicap" is defined as a physical or mental impairment that substantially limits on or more major life activity. [read post]
3 Apr 2012, 8:43 pm by brian
(You can hear more from Florence in an ACS podcast interview. ) via www.aclu.org [ Supreme Court decision @ Florence v. [read post]
25 Sep 2013, 12:46 pm by Stephen Bilkis
The indictment could simply allege that the defendant committed the underlying crime in whole or substantial part because of a belief or perception of the race, or sex, or sexual orientation, or whatever of a person in accordance with People v McDowd. [read post]
12 Jan 2012, 3:27 am by Russ Bensing
  Both are great guys, and very smart people, too. [read post]
17 Aug 2018, 4:00 am by Sean Vanderfluit
’s reasons to be much more compelling, as to me it was more accurate description of the overall circumstances. [read post]
26 Jan 2022, 12:10 pm by Heather Douglas
 In the recent decision, Cicada 137 LLC v. [read post]