Search for: "People v. Powers"
Results 7121 - 7140
of 15,377
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
12 Mar 2012, 8:13 am
Douglas wrote: “Books must serve as powerful agencies of social, economic, or political reform. [read post]
12 Feb 2024, 8:20 pm
The state has power to regulate the National Guard unconstrained by the arms guarantee. [read post]
18 Apr 2019, 8:41 am
How is harm, or the risk of harm, to be determined when different people react in different ways to what they are reading or hearing? [read post]
6 Mar 2018, 4:07 am
The first is Texas v. [read post]
12 Sep 2013, 9:50 am
In Nollan v. [read post]
5 Sep 2017, 1:05 am
In Murr v. [read post]
19 Apr 2023, 8:09 am
Today, in Reed v. [read post]
5 Sep 2017, 1:05 am
In Murr v. [read post]
14 Feb 2010, 4:20 pm
Cir. 2009) Eli Lilly & Co. v. [read post]
12 Sep 2013, 9:50 am
In Nollan v. [read post]
1 Dec 2016, 4:21 am
Yesterday, the court heard oral argument in Jennings v. [read post]
1 Aug 2011, 6:17 am
Patch v. [read post]
18 Jan 2017, 2:06 pm
Gershengorn argues before a six justice bench in Ziglar v. [read post]
18 May 2012, 11:43 am
In this context, we owe much deference to the considered judgment of the People’s elected representatives. [read post]
30 Mar 2016, 9:02 pm
In particular, the legislature was clearly reacting to an ordinance enacted in February by the city of Charlotte, which added “lesbian, gay and transgender” to the list of protected traits for antidiscrimination purposes and provided that transgender people can use public restrooms that correspond with their gender identity. [read post]
27 Dec 2019, 7:55 am
” This overbroad formulation is a far cry from the definition set forth by the Supreme Court in Davis v. [read post]
24 Jul 2018, 5:15 pm
And if users don’t like the way Facebook wields this power, there is nowhere else as ubiquitous or as well-populated for them to go. [read post]
27 Sep 2007, 3:23 am
Freecycle Network, Inc. v. [read post]
30 Jun 2023, 3:28 pm
Garland, in which the justices will consider whether federal courts have the power to review an agency’s determination that a noncitizen did not meet the “exceptional and extremely unusual” hardship requirement to cancel deportation; Campos-Chaves v. [read post]
17 May 2010, 7:52 pm
We don't kill kids (Roper v. [read post]
