Search for: "Short v. United States" Results 7121 - 7140 of 10,141
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
11 May 2012, 3:44 pm by Steve Honig
  In the last Bush Administration, the President’s legal office stated that the Federal government could share enforcement of Federal policy with the States, and that the States therefore could have concurrent authority. [read post]
11 Oct 2010, 9:05 pm
The drywalls in question were imported into the United States from China between 2001 until 2007 due to the shortage of US produced drywall. [read post]
27 Sep 2018, 7:30 am by Jonathan Bailey
 However, all of these arguments have already been dealt with in courts, at least in the United States. [read post]
16 Apr 2014, 4:48 am by Lyle Denniston
  Arguing for the government of Argentina in Republic of Argentina v. [read post]
7 Nov 2014, 11:51 pm by Florian Mueller
The Supreme Court of the United States is concerned with proper interpretation of what Congress decides, and not with making policy judgments for Congress.I'm not going to discuss the frequently-cited SAS Institute v. [read post]
17 Jul 2022, 3:07 am by Florian Mueller
On July 7, United States Patent & Trademark Office Director Kathi Vidal encouraged stakeholders to submit amicus briefs with a view to the Director review of the PTAB decisions in two cases involving challenges to patents asserted by VLSI Technology against Intel. [read post]
2 Aug 2014, 8:34 am by John Jascob
In 2009, United Western Bancorp (Bancorp) conducted a secondary stock offering to raise about $90 million. [read post]
13 Feb 2013, 1:53 pm by Florian Mueller
It's about nothing less than the ability of Apple and other patent holders to win permanent injunctions in the United States against direct competitors infringing some of their patents. [read post]
31 May 2013, 6:59 am by Greg Mersol
  While the appeal was pending, the United States Supreme Court decided the Dukes case. [read post]
18 Jan 2020, 6:30 am by Florian Mueller
It needs to be taken into consideration that monetary compensation is the norm, not a rare exception, in the real world as far as the technology sector (from chipsets to cars) is concerned.In the United States, the fact that someone licensed a patent doesn't necessarily preclude the patent holder from being granted injunctive relief. [read post]
13 Feb 2012, 11:30 pm by Matthew Hill
Ever since the notion of an operational duty was first enunciated in Osman v United Kingdom (2000) 29 EHRR 245, it has become something of a judicial mantra that the threshold for establishing a “real and immediate” threat was high (see for example Re Officer L [2007] UKHL 36, and Savage v South Essex Partnership NHS Foundation Trust [2009] AC 681 [41] and [66],). [read post]
2 Aug 2012, 5:00 am by DaytonDUI
 The Ohio jury Instruction cites language from State v. [read post]
16 Aug 2023, 7:00 am by Brian Finucane
The United States and Kuwait agreed on a plan to reflag 11 vessels as American. [read post]
22 Aug 2016, 6:00 am by Rick St. Hilaire
The group minted a test case seven years ago when it intentionally imported undocumented and unprovenanced ancient Chinese and Cypriot coins to the United States. [read post]