Search for: "State v Cooper"
Results 7121 - 7140
of 8,568
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
11 Sep 2015, 9:00 pm
It would therefore be wise to keep in mind the ruling of the Supreme Court of 6 December 1954 in the case of Holland v United States (348 U.S. 121, 137-138 [1954]): Circumstantial evidence in this respect is intrinsically no different from testimonial evidence. [read post]
4 Dec 2016, 10:58 am
Some states may require the custodial parent involved to give written notice of a move that is intended to the other parent. [read post]
6 May 2017, 5:24 am
Hold my beer, the United States Supreme Court replies in Tolan v. [read post]
17 Aug 2009, 3:00 am
Anjani Kumar Goenka & Anr (IP Frontline) Hollywood v Bollywood v Tollywood: When is ‘plagiarism’ equal to ‘copyright infringement’? [read post]
23 Apr 2019, 9:23 pm
Union of Medical Marijuana Patients, Inc. v. [read post]
17 Dec 2020, 9:28 pm
V. [read post]
8 Jan 2019, 7:52 am
Ravina v. [read post]
17 May 2011, 8:24 am
" In Graham v. [read post]
18 Oct 2010, 1:46 pm
V. [read post]
26 May 2024, 6:57 am
Our prospectus clearly states that we have an unheated pool. [read post]
26 Sep 2013, 4:07 pm
In People v Settles, it was held that this is impermissible. [read post]
19 Jun 2014, 3:03 pm
Compare People v. [read post]
20 Sep 2009, 8:33 am
In the well-known 1987 divorce case of Atkinson v Atkinson, the Court of Appeals established the following test for application of the doctrine:[W]e adopt the doctrine of equitable parent and find that a husband who is not the biological father of a child born or conceived during the marriage may be considered the natural father of that child where (1) the husband and the child mutually acknowledge a relationship as father and child, or the mother of the child has cooperated… [read post]
11 Mar 2011, 10:20 am
If you have read Part I, you are familiar with the Court of Chancery's decision in TR Investors LLC v. [read post]
25 May 2011, 7:56 pm
The judge cited a 1982 7th Circuit case called Neavear v. [read post]
24 Feb 2018, 8:40 am
These questions were recently considered by the Idaho Supreme Court in State v. [read post]
29 Oct 2021, 12:38 pm
James v. [read post]
2 Jul 2020, 9:55 am
The possibility of continued employment becomes even more tenuous if the employee then refuses to cooperate with the employer. [read post]
11 Apr 2017, 9:19 pm
One would repeal the so-called “Chevron” doctrine, so named for a 1984 Supreme Court case of Chevron USA v. [read post]
20 Aug 2010, 5:52 am
McDonald Technology in Litigation: Friend or Foe by Simon V. [read post]
