Search for: "State v Cooper" Results 7121 - 7140 of 8,568
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
30 Mar 2010, 11:17 am by Kevin Poulsen and Kim Zetter
Gonzalez :3/17/2008 7:25:53 PM i stopped bruting the domain admin pw Gonzalez: 3/17/2008 7:26:01 PM after [hacker 2] got domain admin i stopped Source: Government court filing in U.S. v. [read post]
29 Mar 2010, 8:45 am
Although the conduct test was not met, the effects test was.The effects test asked whether conduct outside of the United States had a substantial adverse effect on U.S. investors or securities markets, the court noted. [read post]
26 Mar 2010, 3:53 pm by LindaMBeale
  NY State Division of Human Rights v. [read post]
25 Mar 2010, 7:16 pm by Michael Ginsborg
(Volokh Conspiracy) I link to a Cooper profile here.Marriage equality v. [read post]
25 Mar 2010, 5:00 am by zshapiro
The Eighth Circuit Court of Appeals upheld the search of three residences in a Kansas City methamphetamine case in United States v. [read post]
24 Mar 2010, 4:32 am by Durga Rao
The respondents have stated in their application that the allegations made in the petition arise out of the Joint Venture Agreement (hereinafter referred to as JVA) dated January, 7, 1994 between the petitioner and the respondent, wherein under Article 11, the parties have agreed to refer and determine all claims, disputes, controversies, disagreements, all differences between the parties arising out of or in connection with the agreement by arbitration. [read post]
23 Mar 2010, 5:48 pm by Larry Downes
Google is hacked, Google decides to end cooperation with the government. [read post]
22 Mar 2010, 11:46 pm
Educator terminated after being reported as having improperly attempting to raise her pupils' standardized test scoresRivera v Community School District 9 [NYC], USDC SDNY, Justice Stein, 145 F. [read post]
22 Mar 2010, 1:10 pm by Sheldon Toplitt
DA 09-0570 92009-0570; 2010 MT 55) relied on Article V, Sec. 8 of Montana's Constitution, which states in relevant part: "[a legislator] shall not be questioned in any other place for any speech or debate in the legislature. [read post]
22 Mar 2010, 4:28 am
(Chicago IP Litigation Blog) Patent Compliance Group - First false marking declaratory judgment action filed: North States Indus., Inc. v. [read post]
20 Mar 2010, 3:13 pm by Marta Requejo
With this scenario, is not surprising that the ECJ rulings on art. 20 are awaited with interest; and that we feel a certain disappointment when reading reasonings like those of  Deticek v Sgueglia, (2009) ECJ C-403/09 PPU. [read post]