Search for: "State v. So"
Results 7121 - 7140
of 117,821
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
16 Jun 2014, 12:40 pm
United States [SCOTUSblog backgrounder] that the government can enforce a ban on purchasing a gun for someone else, a so-called "straw purchase," even if that other person is lawfully allowed to have a gun. [read post]
15 Jan 2009, 9:28 am
The Government has filed its opposition to the recon petition in United States v. [read post]
31 Aug 2011, 8:56 am
The Fourth District Court ruled today in State, DOR ex rel Gomez v. [read post]
24 Jan 2007, 1:09 am
On March 16, 2006, I did this post on United States v. [read post]
16 Mar 2010, 9:52 pm
A new published ACCA decision in the case of United States v. [read post]
28 Mar 2005, 12:09 pm
Without comment, the Court denied the appeal of a 2004 ruling [PDF] by the Pennsylvania Supreme Court holding that neither the state nor the Federal Constitution protected the so-called "neutral reportage privilege," a [read post]
13 Feb 2011, 10:25 am
California's Supreme Court has ruled unanimously in Pineda v. [read post]
19 Mar 2018, 10:56 am
In so holding, the Ninth Circuit confirmed that its prior data breach standing precedent in Krottner v. [read post]
19 May 2008, 6:57 am
In doing so, the Walls v. [read post]
24 Apr 2018, 8:08 am
In Lucia v. [read post]
20 Sep 2013, 6:44 am
Here are the materials so far in Black v. [read post]
4 Dec 2007, 3:32 am
The defense attorney has argued that blogs have so exaggerated and distorted the facts of the case that he wants it moved to another part of the state. [read post]
16 Jun 2008, 10:19 pm
United States v. [read post]
14 Feb 2018, 7:16 pm
Selya's opinion for that court today in United States v. [read post]
25 Jul 2023, 9:13 am
Rideau v. [read post]
2 May 2011, 12:25 am
Nicholson v. [read post]
14 Oct 2014, 11:43 am
In Kansas v. [read post]
27 Jan 2009, 8:24 am
Decision is available in our SO-News Group 1-27-2009 Florida: In U.S. v. [read post]
21 Nov 2014, 4:10 am
In the case, a Washington federal district court held unconstitutional the enforcement of rules of the Washington State Pharmacy Board that require pharmacies and pharmacists to dispense emergency contraception even when doing so violates a pharmacist's religious beliefs. [read post]
21 Dec 2009, 7:19 pm
Case Name: People v. [read post]
