Search for: "US v. Smith" Results 7121 - 7140 of 9,460
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
25 May 2010, 9:56 am by Steve Worrall
Browning, Browning & Smith LLC, Marietta, and Stephen C. [read post]
25 Jul 2008, 4:45 pm
If people are using those names then we will take the appropriate court action". [read post]
4 Apr 2018, 3:26 am by Louise Thorning Ahle
In the decision by DKBoA the DKBoA more or less repeated the arguments put forward by the DKPTO and referred to case C-487/07, L’Oréal v. [read post]
10 Jun 2024, 7:24 pm by Yosi Yahoudai
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit considered arguments in the case of Defense for Children International–Palestine v. [read post]
6 Nov 2007, 5:45 am
Coyote Smith wants your comments. [read post]
25 May 2010, 9:56 am by Steve Worrall
Browning, Browning & Smith LLC, Marietta, and Stephen C. [read post]
16 Mar 2012, 9:27 am
 Meanwhile, over on the jiplp weblog, Herbert Smith's Joel Smith, Rachel Montagnon and Anna Gibson write on another recent European ruling and explain that Red Bull can't sue a canning plant for trade mark infringement when it is commissioned to can drinks for its clients but does not sell anything to the public. [read post]
26 Sep 2011, 12:30 pm by FDABlog HPM
Karst –       With each stroke of the pens President Obama used to sign into law the Leahy-Smith America Invents Act, it seemed as though another nail was hammered into the coffin of any attempts to deny The Medicines Company (“MDCO”) a win in the company’s decade-long battle to obtain a Patent Term Extension (“PTE”) for U.S. [read post]
22 Mar 2017, 4:41 pm by Alyson Poole (AU)
For example, registration of a trade mark for a clothing brand “John Smith” would be unlikely to succeed, even if John Smith really is the name of the designer. [read post]
22 Mar 2017, 4:41 pm by Alyson Poole (AU)
For example, registration of a trade mark for a clothing brand “John Smith” would be unlikely to succeed, even if John Smith really is the name of the designer. [read post]