Search for: "United States v. Heard" Results 7121 - 7140 of 8,393
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
15 May 2009, 9:14 am
It further requires that “[t]he tabulation of total population by States … as required for the apportionment of Representatives in Congress among the several States shall be completed within 9 months after the census date and reported by the Secretary to the President of the United States. [read post]
24 May 2022, 6:07 am by David Pocklington
Guernsey Assisted dying in Guernsey: On 7 February 2018, seven Members of the States lodged a Requête – P.2018/24 (Deputy St Pier and 6 other Members) relating to assisted dying for future consideration at States Meetings. [read post]
27 Apr 2015, 4:44 pm by Amy Howe
On the same day that the Court issued its ruling in the California case, it also issued its opinion in a case called United States v. [read post]
1 Feb 2012, 7:34 am by Amy Howe
In a Term in which the Court was not considering the constitutionality of the Affordable Care Act, Texas’s redistricting plans, and Arizona’s controversial efforts to regulate immigration, the Court’s decision in United States v. [read post]
17 Jan 2017, 6:34 pm by Robichaud
On May 10, 2016 the sentencing appeals were heard and a decision was rendered by the Ontario Court of Appeal (Epstein, Pepall, and van Rensbrug JJ.A. presiding [Epstein J.A. writing for the Court]). [read post]
9 Nov 2016, 11:17 am by Mark Walsh
Morales-Santana does not quite rise to the level of United States v. [read post]
9 Sep 2022, 2:55 pm by Eugene Volokh
Moreover, the United States Immigration and Customs Enforcement approved the procedures after it conducted an independent review of the treatment, including review from a nurse and an independent doctor. [read post]
18 Jun 2022, 5:10 am by Ryan Goodman
Did you understand the “he,” in that email, to refer to the President of the United States? [read post]
15 May 2015, 10:18 am by Kali Borkoski
Pulling the thread on that narrative, Brandwein turned to an “unrecognized milestone”: Justice Bradley’s 1874 opinion in United States v. [read post]
27 Feb 2019, 1:07 pm by Amy Howe
Kurtzman, 403 U.S. 602 (1971)Town of Greece v. [read post]
17 Mar 2009, 5:22 pm
--An eligible person described in this subsection is-- (1) an individual who is-- (A) a citizen or legal resident of the United States; or (B) a member of a group that includes citizens or legal residents of the United States; or (2) an entity that is incorporated and maintains its primary place of business in the United States. [read post]
16 Dec 2009, 3:27 am by Russ Bensing
  I think there are 300 — perhaps there are 150 million workers in the United States. [read post]
12 Jan 2015, 10:17 am
 But is this theory applicable to the President of the United States? [read post]