Search for: "United States v. Mark" Results 7121 - 7140 of 10,394
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
1 Feb 2012, 9:15 am by SteinMcewen, LLP
“New” Defense: Prior Commercial Use The United States has not traditionally had an express prior user defense or experimental user defense, but such defenses have effectively always been present. [read post]
31 Jan 2012, 1:16 pm by WIMS
Mark Berkman, author of the report and principal at The Brattle Group stated, "While the U.S. solar industry has many facets and is quite complex, we were able to model the industry by utilizing straightforward economic analytical methods. [read post]
30 Jan 2012, 1:59 pm by Orin Kerr
(Orin Kerr) If anything is clear from the Supreme Court’s decision last week in United States v. [read post]
30 Jan 2012, 11:58 am by Joshua Matz
Last week’s decision in United States v. [read post]
29 Jan 2012, 4:07 pm by INFORRM
[Update] On 27 January 2012 HHJ Parkes QC gave judgment in the case of Patel v United ([2012] EWHC 92 (QB)), heard on 20 January 2012. [read post]
28 Jan 2012, 4:11 pm
Sources: United States Patent and Trademark Office United States Patent and Trademark Office-Trademarks Home California Secretary of State-Trademarks and Service Marks Model State Trademark Law/CA. [read post]
27 Jan 2012, 5:00 pm by Mark Bennett
Judge Blackburn cited two cases in support of his authority to enter such an order: United States v. [read post]
26 Jan 2012, 11:00 am by Lucas A. Ferrara, Esq.
     At the hearing, the United States requested that the court issue an award to the whistleblower whose information led to the conviction of the defendants. [read post]
25 Jan 2012, 2:43 pm by Pace Law School Library
United States Environmental Protection Agency:  Helen Person and the landmark struggleagainst environmental injustice. [read post]
25 Jan 2012, 12:50 pm by Steven Schwinn
United States, doesn’t touch the constitutional issues brewing in the lower courts. [read post]
25 Jan 2012, 7:07 am by Conor McEvily
Monday’s decision in United States v. [read post]