Search for: "Wall v State"
Results 7121 - 7140
of 7,693
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
20 Nov 2008, 6:45 am
(See prior posting and this background.)Now in Merkos L'Inyonei Chinuch, Inc. v. [read post]
17 Nov 2008, 6:39 pm
Buie, No. 070258 Sentence of fifteen years for being a felon in possession of a firearm is affirmed where: 1) because the maximum penalty for the offense to which defendant pleaded guilty was ten years or more under state statute, defendant's state felony narcotics conviction qualified as a "serious drug offense" under the Armed Career Criminal Act (ACCA); and 2) defendant's allegation that he was deprived of counsel at his plea hearing did not state a… [read post]
15 Nov 2008, 6:30 pm
Walls Eastern District of Michigan at Detroit 08a0401p.06 Lorillard Tobacco Co v. [read post]
14 Nov 2008, 6:46 pm
The Court also agreed to decide whether the Constitution requires an elected state judge to step aside from deciding a case involving the financial interests of a major campaign donor (Caperton v. [read post]
14 Nov 2008, 12:15 pm
In addition, Justice LaMarca, citing State of New York v Letterlough, 86 NY2d 259, noted that the Court of Appeals said that the "shaming" of a citizen as a sanction for DWI "is an inappropriate punishment to be directed by a Judge, even if to protect the public and for deterrent purposes. [read post]
14 Nov 2008, 6:25 am
Ritter's letter suggests that the Court's 2005 decision in Van Orden v. [read post]
13 Nov 2008, 10:39 pm
Yesterday's Supreme Court decision in Winter v. [read post]
12 Nov 2008, 8:46 pm
Mutual of Enumclaw Insurance Co. v. [read post]
12 Nov 2008, 8:24 pm
The case of Pleasant Grove City v. [read post]
11 Nov 2008, 11:14 pm
See: White House Suffers Loss in Email Case - Wall Street Journal. [read post]
11 Nov 2008, 1:00 am
V. [read post]
9 Nov 2008, 11:48 pm
(NEJM) The author also stated "To understand who might benefit from high-sensitivity C-reactive protein testing, there should be a detailed analysis of how the estimated (and actual) cardiovascular risk of the screened subjects changed on the basis of their high-sensitivity C-reactive protein levels, particularly in relation to generally accepted risk thresholds and in key subgroups such as women. [read post]
8 Nov 2008, 1:48 am
In Millowitz v. [read post]
8 Nov 2008, 1:48 am
In Millowitz v. [read post]
7 Nov 2008, 12:37 am
Michael Reed v. [read post]
6 Nov 2008, 1:52 pm
Rocky Brands, Inc. v. [read post]
4 Nov 2008, 11:51 am
United States: hard cases make bad law. [read post]
4 Nov 2008, 10:07 am
The remediation company cleaned walls, ceilings, and other items that could retain smoke odor. [read post]
2 Nov 2008, 11:10 am
The Hearing in Wyeth v. [read post]
1 Nov 2008, 3:14 am
Wyeth v. [read post]
