Search for: "*doe, Matter of" Results 7141 - 7160 of 140,217
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
30 Apr 2014, 3:11 am by Jon Hyman
What does an appropriate corporate response to this level of intolerance look like? [read post]
3 Jun 2020, 4:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
Finding that the penalty imposed, dismissal, was disproportionate to Plaintiff's offense, Supreme Court vacated the penalty set in the arbitration award and remanding the matter to DOE to provide for a hearing before a different arbitrator, who would then issue a new penalty determination. [read post]
9 May 2022, 5:05 am by Public Employment Law Press
The Appellate Division, noting that a writ of mandamus "is available to compel a governmental entity or officer to perform a ministerial duty, explained that the writ "does not lie to compel an act which involves an exercise of judgment or discretion" and citing Matter of Brusco v Braun, 84 NY2d 674, explained that such a writ is "an extraordinary remedy that is available only in limited circumstances. [read post]
12 Sep 2012, 8:30 am by scanner1
The Montana Supreme Court has issued an Unpublished Opinion in the following matter: DA 12-0152, 2012 MT 203N, WILLIAM JOSEPH SIRUCEK, Plaintiff and Appellant, v. [read post]
12 Jul 2011, 2:18 pm by scanner1
The Montana Supreme Court has issued an Opinion in the following matter: DA 10-0514, 2011 MT 165, MIKE TOURIS and CHUCK SNEED, Plaintiffs and Appellants, v. [read post]
13 Aug 2012, 6:54 am by scanner1
Ninth Judicial District Court; and JOHN DOES 1 through 5, Respondents and Appellees. [read post]
23 Feb 2010, 10:51 am by Evan Schaeffer
Leslie O'Flahavan at Writing Matters concludes that using "and/or" is "just plain dumb. [read post]
4 Apr 2012, 6:26 am by scanner1
The Montana Supreme Court has issued an Opinion in the following matter: DA 11-0565, 2012 MT 72, CLAYTON E. [read post]
9 Nov 2011, 7:29 am by scanner1
The Montana Supreme Court has issued an Opinion in the following matter: DA 11-0267, 2011 MT 279, DONALD PUHTO and JANET BARRETT, Next of kin of deceased, WALTER UKKOLA, Plaintiffs and Appellants, v. [read post]
21 Dec 2011, 2:23 pm by scanner1
BLUE CROSS AND BLUE SHIELD OF MONTANA, NEW WEST HEALTH SERVICES, MONTANA COMPREHENSIVE HEALTH ASSOCIATION, STATE OF MONTANA, and JOHN DOES 1-100, Defendants and Appellees. [read post]
15 Aug 2012, 1:13 pm by scanner1
The Montana Supreme Court has issued an Opinion in the following matter: DA 09-0547, 2012 MT 177, GRANT CREEK HEIGHTS, INC., a Montana corporation, and KENNETH R. [read post]
14 Apr 2011, 7:24 am by scanner1
LARRY CUMMINGS, CARRIE CUMMINGS, individually and doing business as WHITE BIRCH MOTEL & RV PARK, and JOHN DOES ONE THROUGH TEN, Defendants and Appellees. [read post]
2 Jun 2011, 7:48 am by scanner1
The Montana Supreme Court has issued an Opinion in the following matter: DA 10-0482, 2011 MT 118, GARY HOFF, Plaintiff, appellee and Cross Appellant, v. [read post]
14 Sep 2011, 1:09 pm by scanner1
The Montana Supreme Court has issued an Opinion in the following matter: DA 10-0486, 2011 MT 229, GAIL A. [read post]
23 Dec 2010, 6:59 am by scanner1
BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF GALLATIN COUNTY, a political subdivision of the State of Montana, and John Does 1 through 3, Defendants and Appellees. [read post]
14 Mar 2011, 9:59 am by Nissenbaum Law Group
  The fact that Westboro’s speech took place at a funeral did not change the analysis; the speech still dealt with matters of public concern no matter where it took place. [read post]
14 Mar 2011, 9:56 am by Nissenbaum Law Group
  The fact that Westboro’s speech took place at a funeral did not change the analysis; the speech still dealt with matters of public concern no matter where it took place. [read post]
7 Aug 2015, 9:18 am by Gina Botti
While CCIOA only requires one notice of delinquency be sent to a delinquent owner before the account is turned over for collections, it does not prohibit an association from sending a delinquent owner more than one notice. [read post]
20 Aug 2009, 8:03 am
If my current employer starts the PERM process for me, and at some point I have to switch back to H-1B status due to the fact that TN is not dual-intent, does it matter if it has been many years (definitely more than 6 years) since I was first issued my H-1B visa? [read post]