Search for: "All Defendants"
Results 7141 - 7160
of 165,026
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
29 Sep 2014, 8:52 am
We dismiss as moot the defendant’s claim regarding the pendente lite order and affirm the judgments of the trial court in all other respects. [read post]
15 May 2013, 2:35 am
Supreme Court held a hearing in the murder case of Hrant Dink, who want to appeal the defendant completed the evaluation of Ersin announced its decision in terms of passengers and all other defendants. [read post]
20 Apr 2015, 8:18 am
Elder ("The defendant...appeals from (1) the summary judgment rendered by the trial court in favor of the plaintiff...on his complaint and the defendant's counterclaim; (2) the court's order resetting the law days after the filing of the defendant's bankruptcy petition; (3) the court's approval of the committee's sale, deed, report, fees and expenses, and appraiser fees; (4) the court's denial of his claim of the existence of a bankruptcy… [read post]
2 Jan 2015, 7:07 am
Although certain communications relative to settlement negotiations may be attorney-client communications and/or attorney work-product, at this juncture the Court cannot assume that all of the settlement communications pertaining to Defendants’ licenses are protected by attorney-client privilege and/or attorney work-product. [read post]
21 Aug 2015, 7:08 am
§ 285, including fees incurred during inter partes reexamination in which all asserted claims were cancelled on grounds of invalidity. [read post]
9 Mar 2015, 8:59 am
We disagree with the defendants’ claims and, accordingly, affirm the judgment of the trial court. [read post]
22 Aug 2014, 1:01 pm
Virtually all of [those defendants] have had court-appointed lawyers. [read post]
13 Apr 2015, 11:04 am
The revocation was for a SR term attached to a sentence all agreed was erroneous, and for which the defendant served more time than necessary. [read post]
26 Oct 2016, 10:00 pm
» Related StoriesSearching Only File Names is Not the “Safe Way” to Avoid Sanctions: eDiscovery Case LawIf Plaintiff Wants Discovery on Defendant’s Backup Tapes, Court Rules He Must Pay for Them: eDiscovery Case LawDefendant Not Required to Produce All Documents Responsive to Search Terms: eDiscovery Case Law [read post]
27 May 2021, 5:30 am
R.C.P. 1019(a), which governs the required contents of all pleadings. [read post]
31 Oct 2017, 7:31 am
The Court denies [defendant's] request for monetary sanctions at this time. . . . [read post]
15 Nov 2019, 1:28 pm
The district court ruled for the government on all three issues, holding that there was subject matter jurisdiction, that the MDLEA was constitutional, and that the jurisdiction issue could not be presented to the jury. [read post]
3 Oct 2017, 7:41 am
Following an inter partes review that found all asserted claims of the patents-in-suit unpatentable or invalid, the court denied defendant's motion for attorney fees under 35 U.S.C. [read post]
23 Nov 2014, 5:23 am
Unfortunately for defendants in securities class actions, class certification is granted in whole or in part 84% of the time, and there is no summary judgment decision at all over 90% of the time. [read post]
2 Jan 2020, 12:14 pm
Although this high-profile prosecution was presented as an “insider trading” case, the defendants were acquitted of all of the traditional insider trading charges (the Title 15 offenses). [read post]
26 Oct 2021, 8:18 pm
Fairfax criminal plea deals -- and plea deals in all Virginia courts -- do not bind judges unless they agree to be bound. [read post]
15 Apr 2015, 6:15 pm
The defendant told the officer that someone boarded the bus, showed a handgun, and ordered her to hand him all her money, and then fired a shot that lodged in the driver seat. [read post]
9 Nov 2018, 8:05 am
(Indeed, Judge Weinstein suggests in Trotter that practitioners should move for termination of supervised release in all cases where the defendant has completed one year of supervision.) [read post]
27 Apr 2017, 7:18 am
[The expert] makes no effort to account for other competitors, but claims [plaintiff] would have made all of [defendant's] accused sales for the six identified products. . . . [read post]
29 Apr 2013, 5:25 am
Promega asked the jury to find that all of defendants' sales met the requirements of Section 271. [read post]
