Search for: "B. N. S." Results 7141 - 7160 of 16,708
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
12 Jun 2011, 3:10 pm by sevach
Cuestión de tiempo que el Estatuto Básico del Empleado Público incorpore como principio del empleo público “la ausencia de dificultades perturbadoras”, o que se cree algún “ Observatorio de dificultades perturbadoras” dirigido por algún “perturbado”, para asegurar la máxima especialización y conocimiento de causa. 5. [read post]
11 Oct 2019, 8:48 am
(b)(1) Lack of corporate power or capacity may be asserted by a stockholder in a proceeding to enjoin the corporation from doing an act or from transferring or acquiring real or personal property. [read post]
19 Nov 2010, 9:00 am by Rebecca Tushnet
Panel One Christopher Buccafusco, Chicago-Kent – Moderator Gregory N. [read post]
3 Jun 2008, 7:00 am
” [Emphasis added.]This latest comment follows the Comptroller’s earlier announcement of the agency's  policy change in the February 2008 issue of the Tax Policy News, discussed in a previous post on this site, that co-payments and deductibles received under Medicaid, Medicare and other programs specified in Subsection (n) of Texas Tax Code Section 171.1011 may be excluded from total revenue. [read post]
10 Aug 2012, 3:11 am by tekEditor
In this case, the chi-squared function is given by: \( \displaystyle{\chi^2 (m, b) = \sum_{n = 1} ^N \frac{[y_n - (m \, x_n + b)]^2}{\sigma_n^2}} \quad . \) It’s probably overkill to write this function in C but it’ll do for our purposes today. [read post]
5 Feb 2009, 9:04 am
Según el artículo 8 de la LOSSP, "se entiende por vínculo estrecho toda relación entre dos o más perso ­nas físicas o jurídicas si están unidas a través de una participación o… [read post]
21 Jun 2012, 4:11 pm by sevach
A la vista del panorama, quizás estemos ante la presunción contraria, la de la “insolvencia de la Administración”. [read post]
13 May 2009, 4:20 am
N), and on the listing notice provided to plaintiff by defendant . [read post]
6 Mar 2013, 7:21 pm by rhall@initiativelegal.com
On appeal to the Ninth Circuit, the appellate panel affirmed the certification under Rule 23(b)(2) and on that basis found it unnecessary to consider the certification under 23(b)(3). [read post]