Search for: "BANKS V. STATE" Results 7141 - 7160 of 15,344
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
11 Nov 2014, 12:54 pm by Gene Quinn
CLS Bank would mean that the claims obtained are likely invalid and, therefore, the patent not attractive for purchase. [read post]
10 Nov 2014, 8:39 am by Venkat Balasubramani
Better Broadcasting Crazy SOPA-Like Attempt to Hold International Banks Liable for Pharmacy Spam Fails on Jurisdiction Grounds–Unspam v. [read post]
10 Nov 2014, 7:56 am by David Fagan
By David Fagan and Sumon Dantiki Recently several media outlets reported that the New York State Department of Financial Services (“NYDFS”) sent a letter to many of the nation’s banks, regarding the “level of insight financial institutions have into the sufficiency of cybersecurity controls of their third-party service providers. [read post]
10 Nov 2014, 4:23 am by Mark Summerfield
  Where a computer is involved there is always, of necessity, some physical effect or change of state, at least within the electronics of the machine. [read post]
10 Nov 2014, 3:23 am by Matrix Legal Information Team
R (SG & Ors) v Secretary of State for Work and Pensions, heard 29-30 April. [read post]
9 Nov 2014, 12:44 pm by Stephen Bilkis
I have since that time told both counsels here that if they paid to the bank what the bank will accept, what the banks will accept, that I will not send them to jail, but I will place them on probation. [read post]
8 Nov 2014, 2:03 pm by Stephen Bilkis
The court, in denying the motion, further erred in basing its decision on People v. [read post]
6 Nov 2014, 1:16 pm by Benjamin Bissell
The second incident took place in the West Bank, where a Palestinian driving a van ran into three Israeli soldiers, wounding them. [read post]
5 Nov 2014, 9:27 am by Wells Bennett
At any rate, the burden is on the plaintiffs, under the Amnesty v. [read post]
5 Nov 2014, 2:16 am by Matrix Legal Information Team
Lord Toulson stated that considering the principles of Target Holdings v Redfern, a monetary reward which reflects neither loss caused nor profit gained by the wrongdoer, such as the one argued by the appellant, would be penal. [read post]