Search for: "Defendants A-F" Results 7141 - 7160 of 29,832
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
12 Sep 2007, 8:16 pm
[www.marioncountyclerk.org] Case Number: 42-1981-CF-000170-AXXX-XXFile Date: 02/04/1981Judge: CARVEN D ANGEL DEFENDANT :LIGHTBOURNE IAN (DOB: 1959) Attorney: PUBLIC DEFENDER'S OFFICE Charges Date Citation Count Charge Level Degree Disposition 04/25/1981 1 MURDER IN THE FIRST DEGREE F CAPITAL ADJUDICATED GUILTY Dockets Date Event Count Party Amount 09/12/2007 CORR/MEMO TO CLERKS OFFICE LIGHTBOURNE IAN $0.00 FROM CCRC FILING MOTION… [read post]
23 Jul 2022, 2:31 pm by Josh Blackman
Supp. 3d ___, ___, 2022 WL 658579, *14 (ND Tex., Mar. 4, 2022) (§1252(f )(1) does not bar Texas' claim that the Federal Government is wrongly refusing to detain noncitizens to determine if they have COVID–19); Defendants' Opposition to Plaintiffs' Motion for Temporary Restraining Order 8–9 in Arizona v. [read post]
12 Mar 2019, 3:02 pm by Stan Gibson
Their concern on that point is that Defendant ‘can pursue its anti-trust defense, seeking competitive sales data for the hair extension industry, including sales records of HC1 and HC2 and IDC’ and that ‘[i]f DEFENSE COUNSEL pursue the anti-trust discovery, such discovery demand to HC1 and HC2 will pass through’ an attorney who is both in-house general counsel of IDC and ‘special in-house I.P. counsel’ of the corporate parent and HC2. [read post]
10 Aug 2010, 5:08 am
The officers could lawfully enter the house to arrest defendant because there was a valid outstanding arrest warrant, the location was defendant's residence, and defendant was inside the residence. [read post]
20 Apr 2009, 4:20 am
Elecs. for Imaging, 340 F.3d at 1350; see also Burger King, 471 U.S. at 472-73 (citing Keeton v. [read post]
31 Dec 2011, 9:11 pm
Where the search of defendant’s property was illegal and defendant saw them, confronting him with the product of the search was designed to get him to make a statement which was not attenuated since he had not consulted with a lawyer in the meantime. [read post]
30 Jul 2010, 5:30 am
Co. of Ill., 445 F.3d 801, 803 (5th Cir. 2006), the Fifth Circuit held that the post CAFA amendment of a complaint through the addition of a new defendant commenced a new civil action as to that defendant, and therefore permitted removal under CAFA. [read post]
7 Apr 2008, 4:18 am
The three sets of attorneys named as defendants are Defendants Robert F. [read post]
22 Dec 2016, 4:49 am by The Law Offices of John Day, P.C.
…[I]f the foreseeability and gravity of harm posed from a defendant’s conduct, even if ‘open and obvious,’ outweighed the burden on the defendant to engage in alternative conduct to avoid the harm, there is a duty to act with reasonable care. [read post]
15 May 2014, 1:53 am by Jeremy Saland
In response, the court stated: “[W]e [] find that defendant was properly convicted of [F]orgery because his use of a fictitious name was for the purpose of misrepresentation and was ‘accompanied by a fraudulent design’ (People v.Briggins, 50 NY2d 302, 307 [1980]). [read post]