Search for: "English v. English" Results 7141 - 7160 of 11,204
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
16 Jul 2012, 3:48 am by sally
E v English Province of Our Lady of Charity and another [2012] EWCA Civ 938; [2012] WLR (D) 204 “In a case in which a Roman Catholic parish priest was said to have abused a young girl, and the question arose, as to potential vicarious liability, whether he was an employee, independent contractor, or in some other manner to be considered akin to an employee, the law as to vicarious liability was to be extended such that the question should be approached in a broader way, and… [read post]
16 Jul 2012, 12:49 am by Sam Murrant
July 10, 2012 Rosalind English How most Australians do human rights without a Human Rights Act July 9, 2012 David Hart QC Supreme Court dismisses self-incrimination appeal July 9, [read post]
15 Jul 2012, 5:10 pm by INFORRM
Kyu Ho Youm, “The ‘Neutral Reportage’ Doctrine in English Law”, October 15, 2010. [read post]
13 Jul 2012, 2:42 pm by Sergio Stone
Véron & Associés, a French patent litigation firm, maintains a database of  French patent court opinions translated into English. [read post]
13 Jul 2012, 7:27 am
Copying over phrases to re-enter them in order to totally contort the English translation until it becomes exquisite gibberish. [read post]
13 Jul 2012, 6:54 am by Marilyn Stowe
Gow v Grant Mrs Gow went to live with Mr Grant in 2002, when she was 64 and he was 58. [read post]
12 Jul 2012, 9:32 pm
" had never happened.The offending passage -- which so "shocked" the betrayed Deputy  -- appears (as stated) in First Corinthians (ch. 6, v. 9). [read post]
12 Jul 2012, 10:46 am by Antonin I. Pribetic
  The appellant had ample opportunity to be heard, had he complied with the English rules of court. [read post]
12 Jul 2012, 5:13 am
In Aizkir Navigation Inc v Al Wathba National Insurance [2011] EWHC 3940 (Comm), the High Court considered a principle of contractual construction and held that a clause stating that claims "be settled in accordance with English Law and practice shall be so settled in Abu Dhabi (UAE)" amounted to an exclusive jurisdiction clause in favour of the United Arab Emirates (the UAE) and there was no overwhelming reason to displace that jurisdiction clause.The Claimant, Aizkir,… [read post]