Search for: "Herring v. State"
Results 7141 - 7160
of 58,359
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
25 Jun 2009, 4:36 am
Today, SCOTUS handed down the much-anticipated opinion in Melendez-Diaz v. [read post]
9 May 2009, 12:21 pm
United States v. [read post]
19 Jul 2016, 9:02 am
Rubin’s physician stated: [Ms.] [read post]
14 Dec 2016, 11:29 am
In Liang v. [read post]
14 Dec 2016, 11:29 am
In Liang v. [read post]
18 Jan 2024, 2:40 am
Judge Wendy Beetlestone just denied a critical motion to dismiss in De Piero v. [read post]
6 Apr 2009, 12:22 am
The case is DeLisle v. [read post]
21 Jun 2019, 8:29 am
By contrast, as the Court of Appeal noted at para 42, in many of the leading cases the treatment in itself caused disadvantage: in Clark v Novacold Ltd [1999] ICR 951 the claimant was dismissed; in Lewisham London Borough Council v Malcolm [2008] UKHL the claim was evicted; and in Shamoon v Chief Constable of the Royal Ulster Constabulary [2003] ICR 337 the claimant chief inspector had part of her duties as a manager removed. [read post]
8 Oct 2022, 4:29 am
However, Article V, Section 4A of the Delaware Constitution is explicit on those categories. [read post]
16 Mar 2018, 4:15 am
In Preterm-Cleveland v. [read post]
20 Feb 2024, 9:08 am
Today the Supreme Court denied review in Missouri Department of Corrections v. [read post]
15 Aug 2021, 9:30 pm
Appointments to positions in the classified service are subject to the approval of the New York State Civil Service Department or a local Civil Service Commission or Personnel Officer, depending on the appointing authority involved.[7] A position in the classified service is typically a position in the competitive class or, as provided by law, it may be “jurisdictionally classified” as a non-competitive class position, an exempt class position or a labor class position.[8]All… [read post]
15 Aug 2021, 9:30 pm
Appointments to positions in the classified service are subject to the approval of the New York State Civil Service Department or a local Civil Service Commission or Personnel Officer, depending on the appointing authority involved.[7] A position in the classified service is typically a position in the competitive class or, as provided by law, it may be “jurisdictionally classified” as a non-competitive class position, an exempt class position or a labor class position.[8]All… [read post]
4 Dec 2018, 9:00 am
Finally, the state law tort claims fail for a similar failure to allege facts supporting proximate cause. [read post]
29 Oct 2008, 1:53 pm
Harkless v. [read post]
22 Jun 2009, 9:07 am
United States v. [read post]
20 Aug 2013, 12:33 am
The push came after Cheh became familiar with the Evans v. [read post]
20 Aug 2013, 12:33 am
The push came after Cheh became familiar with the Evans v. [read post]
20 Aug 2013, 12:33 am
The push came after Cheh became familiar with the Evans v. [read post]
