Search for: "Little v. Little"
Results 7141 - 7160
of 39,474
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
25 Apr 2016, 12:12 pm
Sipe v. [read post]
16 Jul 2012, 8:16 am
” But if you set aside section III-C of his opinion—and I realize that’s a little like, “Other than that, Mrs. [read post]
12 May 2009, 8:37 pm
X appeals to the NY Court of Appeals, which ruled 4-3 today (People v. [read post]
27 May 2010, 10:43 am
In particular, the Court reaffirmed the holding in Penn-Plax, Inc. v. [read post]
15 May 2014, 12:44 pm
Case citation: Vazquez v. [read post]
8 May 2022, 2:35 pm
Minteer v. [read post]
5 Dec 2013, 5:23 pm
I think that's right.Justice Turner's opinion is a little confusing in parts because he says things like there's no res judicata because the validity of the claim was never "actually litigated" in the bankruptcy court. [read post]
20 Dec 2019, 9:20 am
I'm a little befuddled by the last line of this opinion.There's a motel in the City of Desert Hot Springs that's an alleged nuisance, so the City files a suit against its owner to abate the thing. [read post]
6 May 2013, 12:09 pm
Particularly when, as with medical marijuana, lots of municipalities pass similar laws, and especially when (as here) there's little to no recourse to an out-of-state forum.There's admittedly a structural problem underneath all of this, and one that the California Supreme Court either overlooks or deliberately fails to mention. [read post]
26 Sep 2013, 2:30 pm
So that no one -- or (more dangerously) no repeat players -- get crushed in a way that they (and others like them) won't forget.A neat little dynamic plays out here. [read post]
6 Feb 2014, 1:08 pm
A little information about how (and perhaps why) cities "race to the bottom" in fighting for business in their area. [read post]
17 Nov 2017, 3:46 pm
Sometimes the Supreme Court has said X, so there's little more that's worthwhile to be said on the subject.But not here.This is a legitimately open issue. [read post]
11 Jan 2013, 1:36 am
The facts of the case showed that the TİB had had little trouble requesting the extension of the initially limited scope of the blocking order. [read post]
29 Jun 2012, 1:12 pm
See United States v. [read post]
21 Mar 2013, 9:41 am
It is more than a little ironic that they decided to review the case on the same day we were all celebrating the 50th anniversary of Gideon v. [read post]
18 Jul 2023, 7:09 am
ML Genius v. [read post]
24 Jun 2015, 4:25 pm
Here the quoted cases were White v Samsung, Wendt v Host International and Douglas v Mattel. [read post]
7 Oct 2008, 5:40 pm
First, it was the Section 2 Report response and before that, it was Commissioner Rosch’s observation that “any kind of economic analyses that require the use of mathematical formulae are of little persuasive value in the courtroom setting” and that “when I see an economic formula my eyes start to glaze over. [read post]
13 Sep 2013, 6:27 am
In Yaman v. [read post]
5 Feb 2021, 4:58 am
There was little dispute that the problem to be solved was the provision of improved RCTs for use in DNA sequencing. [read post]
