Search for: "P. T.2"
Results 7141 - 7160
of 14,921
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
24 Oct 2008, 11:14 pm
(at p. 113) (note: the Law Commission did this comparative work). [read post]
16 Dec 2009, 10:02 am
 William P. [read post]
19 Apr 2012, 7:50 am
And the company’s stock performance last year raises other possibilities — Aon shares eked out a 2 percentage-point gain over the S&P 500, but badly trailed its three closest competitors: Marsh & McLennan (MMC), Willis Group (WSH) and Arthur J. [read post]
24 Aug 2010, 4:30 pm
"Gregory P. [read post]
29 Jan 2021, 2:00 am
Source: Photographee.eu / shutterstock Litany of Disturbing Allegations In 2012, Maria Valentina Spagnuolo began working as a legal assistant for Edward P. [read post]
20 Jul 2011, 3:01 pm
Vigand in the French periodical Propriété Intellectuelle, Décembre 2010, p. 17, in an article dedicated to T 1233/05 (my translation of the French original): … When the prior art is prior art that is relevant for novelty only (A 54(3) EPC), it is absolutely indispensable to have demanding and precise standards for applying the criterion of novelty. [read post]
14 Aug 2011, 8:04 pm
Federal Register, Vol. 76, No. 58, p. 16991. [read post]
8 Apr 2013, 8:09 pm
sMounting bills Project 365(2) Day 142 (Photo credit: Keith Williamson) V is for Voluntary Disclosure. [read post]
8 Jan 2019, 1:46 pm
P’ship v. [read post]
4 May 2020, 8:00 am
§ 125.18(b)(2)(vii) (the section which has the SDVOSB joint venture agreement requirements; cleaned up). [read post]
10 May 2018, 8:02 pm
., Appellee On Appeal from the 333rd District Court Harris County, Texas Trial Court Case No. 2014-10648 O P I N I O N Appellant, Jeffrey L. [read post]
8 Oct 2008, 10:14 pm
Com., 174 Cal. 395, 397, 163 P. 209 (1917) (concerning former Cal. [read post]
5 Jul 2024, 12:14 pm
It gives the E.U. the right to regulate AI “[p]lac[ed] on the market . . . in the Union. [read post]
20 Nov 2017, 6:06 am
P. 37(b)(2)(C) (relating to spoliation of evidence). [read post]
5 Jan 2024, 12:50 pm
Jan. 2, 2024) Some interesting comments on when individual instances of “confusion” don’t count, as well as their relevance to evaluating out-of-court social media etc. statements as evidence of confusion. [read post]
3 Dec 2012, 9:38 am
By a 2-1 vote, Mr. [read post]
21 Mar 2023, 6:00 am
II.2. [read post]
1 Oct 2009, 2:14 am
Id. at *2. [read post]
7 Jul 2019, 7:48 pm
., that it "cannot be adequately explained in terms" of the "sole stated reason" Ross offered--a purported request by the Department of Justice "for improved citizenship data to better enforce [Section 2 of the Voting Rights Act]. [read post]
19 Aug 2020, 4:00 am
Estos elementos solo podrían ser asegurados por el titular mediante una póliza emitida a su nombre. [read post]
