Search for: "People v Long" Results 7141 - 7160 of 18,902
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
14 Feb 2014, 2:54 am by Siobhan Hayes
Caselaw - rectification of the register In February 2014, we saw two judgments from the Supreme Court (Taylor v Betterment Properties (Weymouth) Limited and Adamson & Others v Paddico): In the Weymouth case, Betterment Properties succeeded in their application for deregistration of land as a TVG, therefore the land in question will no longer be protected from development. [read post]
8 Nov 2021, 10:00 am by ernst
[Here is the citation for the Honorary Fellowship of the American Society for Legal History for Víctor Tau Anzoátegui. [read post]
4 Oct 2016, 7:49 am by Sandy Levinson
 What has happened, of course, since 1897 is that this analytic construct, which indeed has its uses, has become accepted as a description of the way that sophisticated people should in fact behave, so that sociopathic behavior becomes normalized, so long, of course, as it doesn't "violate the law. [read post]
26 Mar 2015, 5:41 am by Florian Mueller
That's why, for example, Apple's slide-to-unlock patent was held invalid by ten different judges in three different countries.Losing a patent like slide-to-unlock or rubberbanding in Europe is a disappointment for Apple, but it has no bottom-line impact, at least not in the short term (and probably not even in the mid to long term, though it does make it harder for Apple to position itself as a breakthrough innovator and its competitors (especially those whose devices run on… [read post]
28 Jan 2013, 10:08 am
He assumes that it would have been in common parlance before then, maybe by a long way. [read post]
18 Jul 2013, 3:05 am by Afro Leo
It is not uncommon for trade mark attorneys to berate marketing people about their choice of names for trade marks. [read post]
15 Nov 2023, 4:00 am by Michael C. Dorf
Aaron, each Justice was listed as the author of the ruling that Arkansas Governor Orval Faubus and the Little Rock schools were not entitled to defy the desegregation mandate of Brown v. [read post]