Search for: "Petite v. United States"
Results 7141 - 7160
of 13,105
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
12 Feb 2019, 9:52 am
Trump, President of the United States, et al. [read post]
17 Jan 2009, 2:04 pm
" United States v. [read post]
13 May 2019, 12:57 pm
United States back to the U.S. [read post]
10 Dec 2010, 3:16 pm
As we previously reported, the petitions presented almost identical questions for the Supreme Court’s consideration: “Whether the Eighth Circuit [, in its November 27, 2009 decision in Mensing v. [read post]
3 Jun 2016, 6:15 am
Zhu v. [read post]
3 Jun 2016, 6:15 am
Zhu v. [read post]
6 Feb 2012, 11:03 am
” State v. [read post]
20 Oct 2011, 6:18 pm
United States, 10-9746 (ditto); and Wesevich v. [read post]
6 Jun 2016, 2:14 pm
Applying the multi-part inquiry test for admiralty tort jurisdiction stated by the Supreme Court in Sisson v. [read post]
16 Jun 2008, 4:02 pm
The court just granted cert in a case in which plaintiffâ€â [read post]
25 Mar 2023, 2:40 pm
The plaintiffs have petitioned the Supreme Court to take the case. [read post]
23 Aug 2006, 3:04 pm
The Court of First Instance dismissed that argument on the ground that the two US judgments concerned measures adopted by the United States alone and not measures transposing resolutions of the Security Council. [read post]
21 Feb 2011, 11:05 am
See State v. [read post]
6 Jan 2021, 8:47 am
” A petition for writ of certiorari is pending at the U.S. [read post]
5 Aug 2009, 4:05 am
"DOE's rebuttal: Brown was not entitled to a §3020-a hearing because in contrast to being terminated for alleged misconduct or incompetence, her dismissal flowed from the fact that "she was no longer legally qualified to work in the United States due to the revocation of her visa. [read post]
28 Mar 2012, 9:01 pm
Rubin et al. v. [read post]
5 Nov 2008, 12:44 am
United States (1972) required prosecutors, under their obligation to disclose exculpatory evidence to criminal defendants, to reveal any promises of leniency or other benefits granted to witnesses testifying for the government. [read post]
14 Dec 2007, 7:22 pm
That section is inapplicable here because there is not a United States citizen on each side of the dispute. [read post]
20 Sep 2018, 6:10 pm
As explained in Shapiro v. [read post]