Search for: "State v. Bodi" Results 7141 - 7160 of 14,866
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
30 Jun 2017, 11:52 am by Guest Contributor
But to do this is likewise to challenge the body of authority which now binds us at this level. [read post]
26 May 2023, 1:00 pm by Joel R. Brandes
            The Court concluded that RBKC had standing under Article 8 of the Convention, which states in part that “[a]ny ... institution or other body claiming that a child has been removed or retained in breach of custody rights may apply ... to the Central Authority of any other Contracting State for assistance in securing the return of the child. [read post]
16 Apr 2019, 2:33 am by Patti Waller
E. coliO157:H7 is one of thousands of serotypes Escherichia coli.[1] The combination of letters and numbers in the name of the E. coli O157:H7 refers to the specific antigens (proteins which provoke an antibody response) found on the body and tail or flagellum[2] respectively and distinguish it from other types of E. coli.[3] Most serotypes of E. coli are harmless and live as normal flora in the intestines of healthy humans and animals.[4]  The E. coli bacterium is among the… [read post]
6 Oct 2019, 6:02 am by Thorsten Bausch
Why on earth should a patent office need its own state-like constitutional order with separation of power between a legislative body, an executive body, and, above all, independent courts? [read post]
30 Jul 2015, 6:18 am by Joy Waltemath
Their IIED and negligent hiring, supervision, training, and retention claims failed, however (Arredondo v. [read post]
19 Dec 2019, 5:01 am by Hon. Richard G. Kopf
[v] He taught me a lot even though he was unable to sway the Nebraska Supreme Court. [read post]
1 Jul 2014, 4:17 am by SHG
Potter Stewart wrote an opinion in the 1974 case of Geduldig v. [read post]
28 Feb 2021, 4:37 pm by INFORRM
On 24 February 2021, Saini J handed down judgment in a preliminary hearing on meaning in Ware v French [2021] EWHC 384 (QB). [read post]
22 Aug 2023, 9:15 am by admin
”[4] When the testimony is false or misleading, these bodies should discipline the offender “as appropriate. [read post]
23 Aug 2013, 12:13 pm by Lyle Denniston
Because the Section 3 preclearance requirement has been seldom used, the courts have not developed a significant body of law to sort out how it actually is to work. [read post]
7 Dec 2016, 2:41 pm by Giles Peaker
” The Court of Appeal referred to Prudential Assurance Co. ltd. v London Residuary Body & ors. [read post]