Search for: "State v. C. S. S. B." Results 7141 - 7160 of 15,316
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
28 Sep 2015, 6:00 am by David Kris
  The conflicts are most acute when one country’s legal prohibitions on producing data in response to surveillance directives cannot be squared with another country’s legal compulsions to do so. [read post]
28 Sep 2015, 3:15 am by Peter Mahler
Under these circumstances, the motion record supported Judge Klein’s decision that the continued operation of plaintiff with Carroll as a member was “not reasonably practicable” under N.J.S.A. 42:2B-24(b)(3)(c). [read post]
27 Sep 2015, 1:13 am
  Their collective view was that shape element (A) fell foul of Article 3(1)(e)(i) and shape elements (B) and (C) fell foul of Article 3(1)(e)(ii), but that neither Article 3(1)(e)(i) nor (ii) applied to all of (A), (B) and (C) together. [read post]
26 Sep 2015, 10:22 pm by Patricia Salkin
Next, the court examined Plaintiffs’ constitutional claims pursuant to § 1983 and § 1985 based on the Village’s allegedly discriminatory application and enforcement of the New York State Building Code. [read post]
26 Sep 2015, 7:22 am by Rebecca Tushnet
 Copyright and real estate are different b/c of building and borrowing as key feature of creativity. [read post]
25 Sep 2015, 2:46 pm by Rebecca Tushnet
Dozens of state statutes restrict assignment clauses. [read post]
25 Sep 2015, 9:31 am by Rebecca Tushnet
  B/c author saw the notice, can be inferred that he transferred the rights. [read post]
24 Sep 2015, 8:35 am
The testimonial aspect of production is the implicit statement, upon responding to an order to hand over a specific item, that the item being handed over (a) exists, (b) is the thing being requested, and (c) is in the suspect’s possession. [read post]
24 Sep 2015, 5:00 am by Woodruff Family Law Group
(b) Issue: Is the first wife entitled to half of the marital share of the husband’s retirement benefits? [read post]
24 Sep 2015, 4:30 am by Niamh Quille, Leigh Day
Does Article 22(1)(b) operate to prevent a claimant’s entitlement to the care component of DLA being defeated by a residence requirement imposed by national legislation on a transfer of residence to another member state? [read post]
22 Sep 2015, 8:01 am by John Jascob
Madoff Investments Securities LLC’s day-to-day affairs, and that the complaint failed to plead a primary violation of the securities laws (Dusek v. [read post]