Search for: "State v. Liberator"
Results 7141 - 7160
of 7,776
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
18 Feb 2009, 8:30 am
Contrary to the position of the Bush v. [read post]
16 Feb 2009, 5:19 am
" United States v. [read post]
15 Feb 2009, 2:39 am
Both observed that DOMA is constitutionally infirm to the extent that it reflects a bare desire to harm a politically unpopular group, an interest deemed impermissible in Romer v. [read post]
13 Feb 2009, 7:30 am
Oliver-Smith v. [read post]
9 Feb 2009, 10:07 am
The German newspaper Die Zeit reports that the Bavarian government had enough after the second edition of Zeitungszeugen (which included copies of several historical newspapers, such as the social democratic Vorwärts, the liberal paper Vossische Zeitung, as well as the NSDAP Nazi paper Völkischer Beobachter) also enclosed a reprint of a historical poster showing the Reichstag on fire with a call for voters to vote for Adolf… [read post]
9 Feb 2009, 8:57 am
Consider, for example, Thomas' view of the Commerce Clause that led to his concurring opinion in United States v Lopez. [read post]
9 Feb 2009, 4:51 am
State, 521 So. 2d 135 (Fla. 5th DCA 1988). [read post]
8 Feb 2009, 1:19 pm
" The reference to "states' rights" was a clear signal of support to Mississippi conservatives who had resented federal efforts to bring about school desegregation and biracial poverty programs in their state. [read post]
8 Feb 2009, 5:00 am
LEXIS 7560 (ND CA, Jan. 23, 2009), a California federal district court held that an inmate's allegations, liberally construed, state a 1st Amendment claim that that he was not provided kosher meals or permitted to attend Jewish religious services.In Shatner v. [read post]
7 Feb 2009, 8:38 pm
Rodearmel, (Rodearmel v. [read post]
6 Feb 2009, 8:26 am
In 74 films you’ll see arguments in significant judgments, some actual (C-SPAN) and some, like United States v. [read post]
5 Feb 2009, 11:57 pm
Here is the abstract: In Bell Atlantic v. [read post]
5 Feb 2009, 6:44 am
United States, 431 U. [read post]
4 Feb 2009, 2:14 pm
In Syndicat Northcrest v. [read post]
4 Feb 2009, 1:24 pm
That is because Article V, section 8 of the Florida Constitution states in part that a Judge must be "a member of the Bar of Florida". [read post]
4 Feb 2009, 12:01 pm
The court therefore concluded that the benefit of suppression would be marginal or nonexistent and that the evidence was admissible under the good-faith rule of United States v. [read post]
4 Feb 2009, 3:31 am
Here in SHAHRAM DAVID LAVIAN, -v.- IRA DANIEL TOKAYER, ESQ., 08 Civ. 938 (PAC) (GWG); UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK;2009 U.S. [read post]
2 Feb 2009, 12:49 pm
For an additional case interpreting CAFA liberally to avoid jurisdictional gamesmanship, see State of Louisiana v. [read post]
2 Feb 2009, 8:26 am
I am sure you are aware of the South African court ruling which states that every person counts, including prisoners, in the Universal suffrage. [read post]
1 Feb 2009, 6:20 am
And your claims not withstanding, even liberals know you're liberal. [read post]
