Search for: "State v. Minor"
Results 7141 - 7160
of 16,410
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
15 Mar 2016, 6:13 am
State v. [read post]
15 Mar 2016, 6:13 am
State v. [read post]
14 Mar 2016, 10:59 am
On June 23, 2015, in State v. [read post]
14 Mar 2016, 10:33 am
Legal Standard to Establish Unlawful Discrimination The amended regulations also update the legal standard to establish unlawful discrimination to conform with the California Supreme Court’s decision in Harris v. [read post]
14 Mar 2016, 5:03 am
The plaintiff in Witham v. [read post]
14 Mar 2016, 3:39 am
The case is Verghetta v Lawlor, 2016 NY Slip Op 30423(U) [Sup Ct Westchester County Mar. 9, 2016]. [read post]
14 Mar 2016, 3:39 am
The case is called Verghetta v Lawlor, and you can read here Justice Scheinkman’s 33-page post-trial decision dated March 9, 2016, the opening paragraph of which aptly sets the stage for the fair-value drama that follows, starring dueling appraisals over two thousand percent apart: This Court is called upon to determine the value of two corporate entities for purposes of permitting the buy-out of a minority shareholder. [read post]
14 Mar 2016, 3:39 am
The case is Verghetta v Lawlor, 2016 NY Slip Op 30423(U) [Sup Ct Westchester County Mar. 9, 2016]. [read post]
14 Mar 2016, 2:56 am
Utilizing a different rationale, the court in Avon State Bank v. [read post]
13 Mar 2016, 6:26 pm
Last year, the Supreme Court of Canada held in Mouvement laïque québécois v. [read post]
11 Mar 2016, 3:43 pm
See Dep’t of Transp. v. [read post]
11 Mar 2016, 7:42 am
One child was born of the marriage, and the primary issue in the case involved custody of the parties' minor child. [read post]
10 Mar 2016, 11:14 am
In a 2002 case, Locke v. [read post]
10 Mar 2016, 12:00 am
Philipp Werner, Jones Day has written on HSH Nordbank v Commission: Action for Annulment by Minority Shareholders Against State Aid Decisions Approving Aid in the Form of a Capital Increase. [read post]
9 Mar 2016, 8:02 pm
In 1991, the Supreme Court decided West Virginia University Hospitals v. [read post]
9 Mar 2016, 7:01 am
Doe” or United States v. [read post]
9 Mar 2016, 4:22 am
At PrawfsBlawg, Seth Davis discusses standing and United States v. [read post]
8 Mar 2016, 4:02 pm
The suggested fine is $100 because it was believed by the State Attorney's Office that individuals will be less likely to fight the charges. [read post]
8 Mar 2016, 9:59 am
Generally true for China, with a few minor modifications. [read post]
7 Mar 2016, 1:36 pm
Citing Gentile v. [read post]