Search for: "State v. So" Results 7141 - 7160 of 117,821
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
14 Apr 2023, 4:41 pm by INFORRM
” Take care with that social media duty of care October 2018: “[Rhodes v OPO] aptly illustrates the caution that has to be exercised in applying physical world concepts of harm, injury and safety to communication and speech, even before considering the further step of imposing a duty of care on a platform to take steps to reduce the risk of their occurrence as between third parties, or the yet further step of appointing a regulator to superintend the platform’s… [read post]
14 Apr 2023, 1:58 pm by Jennifer S. Bard
It is because the decision making authority is so valuable to so many people that the federal government has a robust and comprehensive infrastructure to prevent influence. [read post]
14 Apr 2023, 12:30 pm by John Ross
But the state agrees to settle, so the district court doesn't rule on the statute's constitutionality. [read post]
14 Apr 2023, 7:24 am by The Petrie-Flom Center Staff
“NN or D., v. s/ protection and guard of people” The new regime of precautionary measures against the National State established by Law No. 26,854 and its potential impact in the field of collective proceedings Abeledo Perrot Commercial Law Magazine Nº 233 Adequate representation in North American Class Actions La Ley Magazine (Argentina) Judicial Control of Public Policies (About a Brazilian Bill) Verification of the essential precautions where it systematizes… [read post]
14 Apr 2023, 5:56 am by Florian Mueller
Given their stated concern about the need to license non-essential patents belonging to SEP owners, the draft regulation is counterproductive for their purposes. [read post]
14 Apr 2023, 4:52 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
” With regard to plaintiff’s account stated claim, defendant asserted, without corroboration, that she had objected to the invoices at various points, but those “self-serving, bald allegations of oral protests were insufficient to raise a triable issue of fact as to the existence of an account stated” (Darby & Darby v VSI Intl., 95 NY2d 308, 315 [2000]; accord Schlenker v Cascino, 124 AD3d at 1153). [read post]